AW: AW: [ RadSafe ] Re: "Science" reports on background radiation andhealth

[John Jacobus]

Do you have any science to back these statements up? 
Otherwise they are not science but your opinions. 
Right?

--- Rainer.Facius at dlr.de wrote:

> The contents is sound science, i.e. people in HBRAs
> do not suffer from quite large amounts of ionising
> radiation but to the contrary do live more healthily
> than perfectly comparable control populations !
>  
> Regards, Rainer
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Von: John Jacobus [mailto:crispy_bird at yahoo.com]
> Gesendet: Mi 10.08.2005 18:32
> An: Facius, Rainer; maurysis at ev1.net; jimm at WPI.EDU
> Cc: cdn-nucl-l at mailman1.cis.mcmaster.ca;
> mbrexchange at list.ans.org; radsafe at radlab.nl
> Betreff: Re: AW: [ RadSafe ] Re: "Science" reports
> on background radiation andhealth
> 
> 
> 
> And you point is . . .?
> 
> --- Rainer.Facius at dlr.de wrote:
> 
> > John:
> >
> >       It is the contents and not the sound that
> counst!
> >
> . . .

+++++++++++++++++++
"Every now and then a man's mind is stretched by a new idea and never shrinks back to its original proportion." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.

-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com