[ RadSafe ] Another Letter to the Editor about DU

[BLHamrick at aol.com]

Just to clear things up, it was Bob Cherry who posted the query about  
continuing to provide information on the DU issues, not me.  I just agreed  that I 
would like them to continue.
 
I believe the confusion arose because of the way AOL "quotes" an  email.  
I'll try to be more careful about that in the future...or, change  services, one 
of these days.
 
Barbara
 
In a message dated 8/19/2005 4:58:03 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
Paul_Prichard at dom.com writes:

<<Some you  have privately expressed support when I tell you  of another
anti-DU
article in  the media. Some of you have  privately asked me to stop sending
such notes to  Radsafe. I would  like to know what is preferred: to keep
this to
myself or let  you  know what the activists are saying about DU and my
occasionally   responses.

Personally, Barbara, I prefer that you continue  posting.  If there are news
pieces that are wrong or deceptive,  especially in national news media, I
think it's important for us to be  aware of them.  I believe that each one
adds to the cumulative effect  of misinformation.  (My personal ire is
raised whenever nuclear power  and nuclear weapons proliferation are lumped
together into the same  sentence as many seem to do.)  The public should
have the facts  (though it may not know what to do with them) and if a few
lone voices from  the wilderness can provide the facts, then I also have the
opportunity to  learn from them.>>