[ RadSafe ] Re: attn. Landauer Customers
Sandy Perle
sandyfl at earthlink.net
Wed Aug 24 17:16:57 CDT 2005
On 24 Aug 2005 at 15:03, Wright, Will (DHS-PSB) wrote:
> i believe i deleted the initial strings, could someone briefly
> describe the issue or was this simply a discussion about the
> inconvenience of maintaining a control. controls are critical as
> indicated in all objective science endeavors/ bench top science as
> well as others will teach this the hard way.
Will,
There are 2 areas of interest.
(1) First was how to handle a situation when no Control badge is
returned. This raised a method, but there are various technical
issues that need to be addressed when utilizing this method.
(2) Secondly, a question was asked as to why not simply use a fixed
subtraction and not use a control badge. This is obviously not a
better approach to background subtraction, for all the reasons
stated.
The discussion and various ideas posed really need to be assessed as
to whether item (1) or item (2) above is the issue at hand. As
stated, they both are quite different, and, propose varying
assessments.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306
Fax:(949) 296-1144
Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list