[ RadSafe ] Re: Stopping "Al Queda in Iraq" Shields the USA from Radiation Attack

[Khalid Aleissa]

Iraq do have more important things than fission bombs .... Oil ... does this 
bring a 2nd thought
Now, as a radsafer, I believe that we should defend radiation protection and 
find a place for our activity in Iraq .. who knows, oil might has 
radioactivity .. or atractivity ...may be it has C-14 more than what we used 
to believe ...
Guess what, that was just barbing and distracting people (radasfers) 
attention by echoing what media brings to our minds ...
So what about focusing on Radsafe issues ..

Please do concentrate on radasfae issues.

Khalid


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Jacobus" <crispy_bird at yahoo.com>
To: "howard long" <hflong at pacbell.net>; "Khalid Aleissa" 
<kaleissa at kacst.edu.sa>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 4:21 PM
Subject: Re: Stopping "Al Queda in Iraq" Shields the USA from Radiation 
Attack


> Howard,
> Iraq did not and never had fission bombs.  Please try
> to stay up to date.
>
> --- howard long <hflong at pacbell.net> wrote:
>
>> 1. "Radiation safety" in the USA in the next 10
>> years is likely to include
>> protecting the public from a radioactive bomb
>> attack.
>> This is the estimate of several commissions.
>> 2. Others indicate Iraq and Iran as sources of
>> fission bombs
>> for terrorist groups like Al Queda in Iraq that have
>> declared intent to use them here.
>> 3. Current competition between USA regulatory
>> agencies for clean-up standards
>> (some to below background!) is likely to determine
>> future employment of many
>> Radsafe participants.
>> 4. "Does 10 rad acute (more over a year) increase or
>> decrease likelihood of cancer?" and
>> "What is the likelihood of terrorists creating a
>> preventable panic in the USA from radiation?"
>> become important debates for any thinking Radsafe
>> participant.
>>
>> Those who blindly follow orders of whichever agency
>> has the most political clout
>> will not trouble themselves.
>>
>> Howard Long
>>
>> John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Khalid,
>> I might suggest the use of the delete key for
>> subjects
>> that you might find inappropriate to RadSafe or are
>> of
>> no interest. There are many postings that I will
>> delete when I open the message and see the substance
>> of the first paragraph.
>>
>> I have read and posted on this list server many
>> years.
>> Many of the topics and questions reappear again and
>> again. However, I have always found new things to
>> learn, even if the subject itself is not what I
>> would
>> consider to be appropriate to the original purposes
>> of
>> RadSafe.
>>
>> --- Khalid Aleissa wrote:
>>
>> > My comment is not to the text body of the massage
>> > but to the subject of it.
>> > I do not see any relation to this with the
>> > objectives of radsafe.
>> >
>> > I ask kindly radsafe admin to make another list
>> > called radsafe-tec. This new
>> > list has to be really for technical issues related
>> > to radiation safety
>> > (possible, add to that health physics and
>> > radiobiology).
>> >
>> > Let's make a vote for this proposal!
>> >
>> > Regards.
>> >
>> > ----- Original Message ----- 
>> > From: "howard long"
>> > To: ;
>> > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:37 AM
>> > Subject: [ RadSafe ] Iraq Shield the USA from
>> >
>> >
>> > > Saddam's trial soon will publicize the far more
>> > frequent deaths before
>> > > March '03 than since.
>> > > 1, Saddam was gassing and otherwise executing
>> > Iraqi, Iranians, Kuwaiti,
>> > > etc, and starving Marsh Arabs and children,
>> using
>> > oil money from UN
>> > > conspirators for palaces.
>> > > 2. More pertinent to Radsafe, the Duelfer (sp?)
>> > and other commissions
>> > > found his
>> > > nuclear bomb team ready to continue. It was once
>> > within 2 years.Saddam's
>> > > brother in law, not the UN, revealed it, giving
>> > urgency to "British
>> > > Intelligence has learned - ", (later confirmed).
>> > > 3. Baathist (Nazi) murderers and "Al Queda in
>> > Iraq" (Zarkawi) state their
>> > > intent to
>> > > atom bomb the USA. They now bomb in Iraq instead
>> > of here.
>> > > Iraq draws those who would bomb us here -as you
>> > can find easily for
>> > > yourself.
>> > > 4. The 200,000 Iraqi increasingly protecting
>> their
>> > growing economy (look
>> > > at the traffic jams on TV) save Americans here.
>> > >
>> > > Iraqi Freedom saves 10 x as many lives as it
>> costs
>> > (especially, ours)
>> > >
>> > > Howard Long
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 5 Nov 2005 at 10:31, howard long wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I am disgusted with media that will not report
>> > the Bush Policy saving
>> > >> the 100 Iraqi Saddam murdered daily and
>> > protecting us from Saddam's
>> > >> recessed nuclear bomb team (Duelfer
>> Commission).
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> +++++++++++++++++++
> On Oct. 5, 1947, in the first televised White House address, President 
> Truman asked Americans to refrain from eating meat on Tuesdays and poultry 
> on Thursdays to help stockpile grain for starving people in Europe.
>
> -- John
> John Jacobus, MS
> Certified Health Physicist
> e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
> http://farechase.yahoo.com
>