[ RadSafe ] PET Layout - underground or not

[North, David]

That's a ridiculous requirement, and it will be difficult to find support
for the ridiculous.

David L. North, Sc.M., DABR
Associate Physicist
Medical Physics
Main Bldg. Rm 317
Rhode Island Hospital
593 Eddy St.
Providence, RI 02903
(401)444-5961
fax: (401)444-4446
dnorth at lifespan.org



> ----------
> From: 	radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl on behalf of Mauro Campoleoni
> Sent: 	Monday, October 17, 2005 4:58
> To: 	radsafe at radlab.nl
> Cc: 	colonnelli at policlinico.mi.it
> Subject: 	[ RadSafe ] PET Layout - underground or not
> Importance: 	High
> 
> Hi to you all!
> 
> I have an unusual question today.
> A friend, involved in some legal controversy, asked me to find
> some support to the fact that a PET "has" to be installed underground,
> for safety reasons.
> Do you agree with this? WHERE can I find an article or similar document
> arguing this necessary condition?
> 
> Thanks a lot.
> 
> Mauro Campoleoni
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------
> Unità Operativa di Fisica Sanitaria
> Fondazione "Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico Mangiagalli e Regina Elena"
> Via Pace, 9 20122 - Milano - ITALY
> tel. +39+2+5503.3007
> fax +39+2+5503.5100
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
> 
>