[ RadSafe ] Looking for References on Liquid Scintillation Counting for Tritium
Felipe Gaitan
gaitan at impulsedevices.com
Tue Sep 6 14:26:45 CDT 2005
Gentlemen,
Thank you Alex, Franz and Bob for your response. I'm writing to the
list in case other people are interested but we could communicate off
line if you prefer.
So far the consensus is that there are no definite references due to
the fast pace of development and that the two main categories are
high and low count rates. So it looks like I need to give more
details about our particular application.
We are trying to replicate an experiment done at Oak Ridge (and more
recently at Purdue) in which the authors claim to be producing
Tritium in deuterated acetone using acoustic cavitation.
Here is a summary of what I consider are the relevant parameters (let
me know if you think I'm missing any):
1. Sample liquid: both regular and deuterated acetone. According
to the authors, the tritium backgrounds for regular and deuterated
acetone are about 20 CPM and 50 CPM respectively. Deuterated acetone
has a higher background due to tritium contamination (I assume during
the deuteration process). As far as I know, they have used regular
(not super-low background) LS counters (Beckman LS6500, I believe)
2. They measure anywhere between 2-15 CPM above background for the
deuterated acetone (none for the other control samples including
regular acetone)
3. I'm aware that chemiluminescence (CL) and other types of
luminescence can interfere with tritium measurements and I don't know
if or how the authors compensated for it. I wouldn't be surprised if
acoustic irradiation could excite some molecules and cause them to
emit photons. I don't think the regular machines can compensate for
CL when the count rate is that low (right?). The only way I know is
to monitor the count rate (both coincident and non-coincident) as a
function of time.
Here are my questions:
1. Do you know anybody measuring low levels of tritium is acetone
samples? I'm wondering if there are particular issues with acetone.
2. Are there techniques for eliminating CL interference at low count
rates (a few CPM above background)?
3. What other effects can interfere with this kind of measurements?
Thanks in advance,
Felipe
--
D. Felipe Gaitan, Ph.D.
Chief Scientific Officer
Impulse Devices, Inc.
13366 Grass Valley Av. Unit H
Grass Valley, CA 95945
Phone: 530-273-6500 Ext. 112
Fax: 806-498-6731
email: gaitan at impulsedevices.com
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list