[ RadSafe ] Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Could Have Been Worse
John Jacobus
crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Thu Sep 8 11:32:41 CDT 2005
Susan,
Thanks for this copy. So the estimate is 3,490
additional cancers among the typical number of 131,333
cancers. And that is plus or minus what?
--- Susan Gawarecki <loc at icx.net> wrote:
> More details from the report.
>
> --Susan Gawarecki
>
> Chernobyl Nuclear Accident Could Have Been Worse
>
http://www.medpagetoday.com/PublicHealthPolicy/PublicHealth/tb/1686
>
> By Michael Smith , MedPage Today Staff Writer
> Reviewed by Zalman S. Agus, MD; Emeritus Professor
> at the University of
> Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
>
> Review
>
> VIENNA, Sept. 5 - The Chernobyl nuclear disaster 19
> years ago may
> eventually lead to up to 4,000 deaths from radiation
> exposure, but so
> far fewer than 50 people have died from the direct
> effects of radiation,
> a United Nations report says.
>
> Most of the deaths were among emergency workers and
> came within months
> of the April 26, 1986, explosion, which has been
> called the world's
> worst nuclear accident. The toll also includes nine
> children who died of
> thyroid cancer from drinking radiation-tainted milk.
>
> The UN report says there will likely be 3,940 excess
> cancer and leukemia
> deaths among the roughly 600,000 people who were
> exposed to high levels
> of radiation after the accident, but that is only
> about a 3% increase
> over the rate of spontaneous cancer deaths and may
> be difficult to detect.
> . . .
+++++++++++++++++++
"Every now and then a man's mind is stretched by a new idea and never shrinks back to its original proportion." -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.
-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
______________________________________________________
Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.
http://store.yahoo.com/redcross-donate3/
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list