[ RadSafe ] Greenpeace: Chernobyl Toll May Top 90,000

[Fred Dawson]

Report available at

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/news/chernobyl-deaths-180406


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl at earthlink.net>
To: <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 3:25 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Greenpeace: Chernobyl Toll May Top 90,000


Index:

Greenpeace: Chernobyl Toll May Top 90,000
Hiroshima foundation to release blood data on Chernobyl firefighter
Mammograms safe for women with cancer risk
Watching out for radiation
Japanese city could accept US nuclear ship
Public opinion warming to nuclear power
Petition for nuclear-free Wales
=================================

Greenpeace: Chernobyl Toll May Top 90,000

KIEV, Ukraine Apr 18 (AP) - Greenpeace said Tuesday in a new report
that more than 90,000 people were likely to die of cancers caused by
radiation from the Chernobyl nuclear disaster, countering a
United Nations report that predicted the death toll would be around
4,000.

The differing conclusions underline the contentious uncertainty that
remains about the health effects of the world's worst nuclear
accident as its 20th anniversary approaches.

A reactor at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine exploded on
April 26, 1986, spewing radioactive clouds over much of Europe. The
fallout was particularly severe in northern reaches of Ukraine,
western Russia and Belarus.

Areas immediately around the now-inoperative plant remain off limits,
but people in other areas that received significant fallout are
anxious about their health.

A report by the Chernobyl Forum - a group comprising the
International Atomic Energy Agency and several other U.N. groups -
last year said only 56 deaths thus far could be connected to
Chernobyl and about 4,000 deaths total would ultimately be linked to
the accident.

But Greenpeace, in a report citing data from Russia, Belarus and
Ukraine, harshly disagreed and suggested the Chernobyl Forum report
was deliberately misleading.

"It is appalling that the IAEA is whitewashing the impacts of the
most serious nuclear accident in human history," Ivan Blokov of the
environmental group's Russia office said in a statement. "Denying the
real implications is not only insulting to the thousands of victims
but it also leads to dangerous recommendations and the relocation of
people in contaminated areas."

The Chernobyl Forum report had suggested that many of the health
problems and complaints in the regions around Chernobyl were
connected with unhealthy lifestyles, including heavy drinking and
smoking, and with a culture of victimization.

Greenpeace countered that statistics from Belarus indicate there will
be 270,000 cases of cancer attributable to Chernobyl radiation
throughout the region and that 93,000 of those are likely to be
fatal.

Greenpeace also cited a report by the Center for Independent
Environmental Assessment of the Russian Academy of Sciences that
found a sharply increased mortality in western Russia over the past
15 years, suggesting the rise was due to Chernobyl radiation.

"On the basis of demographic data, during the last 15 years, 60,000
people have died additionally in Russia because of the Chernobyl
accident and estimates of the total death toll for Ukraine and
Belarus could be another 140,000," Greenpeace's international office
said in a statement.

The report also finds that "radiation from the disaster has had a
devastating effect on survivors" other than cancer cases - "damaging
immune and endocrine systems, leading to accelerated aging,
cardiovascular and blood illnesses, psychological illnesses,
chromosome aberrations and an increase of deformities in fetuses and
children."
---------------

Hiroshima foundation to release blood data on Chernobyl firefighter

(Kyodo) Appr 18 _ The Radiation Effects Research Foundation in
Hiroshima will soon release the test results of blood samples taken
from the chief firefighter in the 1986 Chernobyl disaster that have
been kept at the institute.
The test conducted three and a half years after the accident showed
that Leonid Telyatnikov was developing chromosomal abnormalities in
40 percent of his lymphocytes, a result never made public before.

Akio Awa, 72, who was then the chief of the Department of Genetics at
the foundation, analyzed the samples. He decided to publish the data
after learning about Telyatnikov's death in 2004.

The data will soon be published in an academic paper on the occasion
of the 20th anniversary of the disaster.

Telyatnikov asked for a blood test after he heard of the foundation,
which conducts health surveys on atomic bomb survivors, when he was
visiting Hiroshima in October 1989 to give a talk.

At the talk, Telyatnikov described his ordeal during the 20 days
following the accident, including losing his hair and developing red
spots in his hands.

An analysis of 200 lymphocytes showed chromosome abnormalities in
about 40 percent of the cells, including translocation, a condition
in which a fragment of one chromosome is broken off and then attached
to another.

Awa said he believes Telyatnikov had absorbed 4 grays of radiation,
equivalent to the amount one would absorb at 900 meters to 1
kilometer away from the epicenter of the atomic bomb explosion in
Hiroshima. This level of radiation normally kills about half of the
exposed people within 60 days.

Telyatnikov died of cancer in December 2004 at age 53.

Awa wrote a letter to Telyatnikov's widow, Larisa, 58, attached a
microscopic photograph of chromosomes, and had them delivered to her
through a Kyodo News reporter.

Larisa, who lives in Kiev, in turn wrote a thank you note on the back
of a photograph of her husband and left it to the care of the
reporter.

Awa, who is examining the data before submitting the paper to a
science journal, says he feels relieved that he could contact
Telyatnikov's family.

"I want to write this paper as the last big project in my life," he
said.

The foundation's physician, Kazuo Neriishi, took Telyatnikov's blood
samples. He recalled Telyatnikov as well-built and very firefighter-
like, and remembered seeing his thick arm as he drew blood.

Telyatnikov asked Neriishi what are the things he should be careful
about in everyday life. Neriishi told him people exposed to radiation
can develop the same diseases as those who are not, and that he has
higher risk of developing cancer. Neriishi gave him Japanese green
tea because it is believed to have cancer-fighting properties.

"This experience led me to realize how important it was to call on
the survivors of the atomic bomb to avoid tobacco and other cancer-
causing products, and to be careful about their diet," Neriishi said.

The Chernobyl disaster began April 26, 1986, in a civilian nuclear
power station in Ukraine, then part of the Soviet Union. The plant's
No. 4 reactor exploded while on a test run, releasing massive amount
of radioactive materials into the atmosphere.

The accident contaminated all of Europe and caused thyroid cancer
among many children.

The Chernobyl Forum, a group comprising the International Atomic
Energy Agency and others, says about 4,000 people have died, but the
number of casualties remains unknown, with some saying it totals
several hundred thousand.
-----------------

Mammograms safe for women with cancer risk

Special To Washington Post Apr 18 - The question: Some experts
speculate that women whose genes make them prone to breast cancer
also may be more susceptible to damage from the low-dose radiation of
mammograms. Because these women, on the advice of their doctors,
often start having mammograms at an earlier age and have them more
frequently than other women, might they be adding to their risk of
breast cancer?

This study reviewed questionnaire responses from 3,200 women with
mutations of the breast cancer gene (BRCA-1 or BRCA-2); half of them
had breast cancer. Those with cancer had about the same number of
mammograms as those without cancer: an average of six to seven every
10 years.

Who may be affected by these findings? Women with a breast cancer
gene mutation. About 5 percent of the more than 212,000 American
women diagnosed each year have such a mutation.

Caveats: The data were based on recollections of the participants.
Diagnostic mammograms - those done in response to an abnormal breast
finding, often from a screening mammogram - were not included in the
analysis. Women in the study had fewer mammograms (averaging one
every 19 months) than the number (one a year) recommended for high-
risk women; whether the results apply to high-risk women getting
annual screenings remains unclear.

Find this study in the March 22 online issue of The Lancet Oncology;
abstract available at http://oncology.thelancet.com.

Learn more about hereditary breast cancer at www.genome. gov and
http://ghr.nlm.nih.gov .

Research described here comes from credible, peer-reviewed journals.
Still, conclusive evidence about a treatment's effectiveness is
rarely found in a single study. Anyone considering treatment of any
kind should consult with a physician.
-----------------

Watching out for radiation

THE NEW YORK TIMES Apr 17 - THE FACTS: Up until about 1970, millions
of glow-in-the-dark watches sold in the United States were made with
radium, a radioactive substance that was painted on watch dials to
give them their characteristic luminosity.

Radium was eventually banned after scores of dial painters died from
cancer and various ghastly ailments. But many of the so-called radium
watches are still around today, considered antiques and even prized
as collectibles. The watches are likely to emit as much radiation
today as they did when they were first manufactured, but experts say
that in reality, the risk to wearers is probably low.

One study by the Public Health Service many years ago found that a
person who wears a radium watch for 24 hours a day over the course of
a year could conceivably be exposed to 65 to 130 millirems of
radiation.

By way of comparison, the average person is exposed to about 300
millirems of background radiation in a typical year, and a single
chest X-ray exposes a patient to about 5 to 10 millirems of
radiation.

That means a person who owns a radium watch (and presumably isn´t
wearing it 24 hours a day) has little to worry about, said Dr. M.
Donald Blaufox, the chairman of the department of nuclear medicine at
the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in the Bronx.

A radium watch becomes hazardous only when someone opens one and
tinkers with the dials, inhaling radioactive dust particles.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Watches and clocks made with radium are considered
safe so long as they remain intact.

Antique watches made with radium can emit high levels of radiation.
------------------

Japanese city could accept US nuclear ship

TOKYO (AFP) Apr 18 - A Japanese mayor says he may drop objections to
his city hosting the first US nuclear-powered warship to be based in
Japan after Washington offered safety assurances.

The US Navy wants to station the USS George Washington in Japan from
2008, the first time a US nuclear-powered aircraft carrier will have
been based overseas, raising protests in the only nation to have
suffered nuclear attacks.

Yokosuka Mayor Ryoichi Kabaya, whose city on Tokyo Bay hosts the
country's largest US Navy base, said he was impressed by a 10-page
fact sheet on safety drafted by the United States at the request of
the community.

"The report is more concrete and detailed than we had expected,"
Kabaya told reporters late Monday.

"Although there remains the issue of protective measures in the event
of natural disasters, we could possibly move toward accepting the
nuclear-powered ship," he said.

The US military wants to replace the conventional USS Kitty Hawk with
the nuclear-powered George Washington, saying it must send the best-
quality ships to East Asia due to the unpredictable security
environment.

Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, who represents Yokosuka in
parliament, has already approved the plan. But local residents
including the mayor had pledged to fight hosting the nuclear carrier.

The safety report, handed over Monday by US ambassador Thomas
Schieffer to the foreign ministry, gives details of the operation of
the USS George Washington and the potential impact on the environment
and crew members.

"The US government is committed to working together with the
government of Japan to address these concerns," Schieffer told
Foreign Minister Taro Aso, according to the US embassy.

Activists campaigning against the nuclear ship, however, immediately
rejected the fact sheet.

"The report has nothing new," said Masahiko Goto, leader of a
Yokosuka-based group opposing the carrier's deployment.

"It has nothing more than what the US Navy has already revealed to
local residents of communities hosting nuclear ships in the United
States," he said. "What we want to know is information on accidents,
but they have been hiding that kind of information."

"We lodged a protest to our mayor that we can't accept such a
unilateral supply of information," Goto said.

The report said the carrier is 10 times sturdier than US commercial
nuclear power plants in withstanding the shock of earthquakes -- a
major concern in Japan which endures 20 percent of the world's major
tremors.

The USS George Washington's deployment is separate from a plan on
realigning US troops in Japan over which the allies have held
protracted negotiations, mostly about how to share the cost.

US troops are based in Japan under a security alliance after Tokyo
lost World War II and was forced to renounce the right to a military
--------------------

Public opinion warming to nuclear power

LONDON (AFP) Apr 18 - Britons have softened their stance towards
nuclear power but most are still against building new reactors.

A survey for Tuesday's edition of the Financial Times newspaper by
consultants KPMG and pollsters YouGov, suggested that 45 percent of
respondents want a reduction in the number of nuclear reactors,
against 36 percent who said they wanted an increase.

Some 19 percent were either unsure or wanted nuclear capacity to
remain constant.

Last year, the responses were 59 percent against, 29 percent in
favour and 13 percent undecided to the same questions.

Support remained strong for renewable forms of energy like wind power
but 44 percent said they were not prepared to pay extra for so-called
"green" energy.

The FT said the rise in opposition to higher charges -- 23 percent
were against last year -- indicated that consumers were feeling the
pinch from recent rises in energy bills for electricity and gas.

Late last year, Prime Minister     Tony Blair announced a wide-
ranging review of Britain's future energy requirements in the light
of dwindling reserves of North Sea oil and gas and the need to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions.

The review, which will be published in several months' time, is
widely expected to back the building of new nuclear reactors combined
with renewable energy provision.

Just under 20 percent of Britain's electricity comes from nuclear
power stations, which were mainly built in the 1950s and 60s, but all
but one of the plants will have been decommissioned by 2023.

The review is likely to heighten the debate between supporters and
opponents of the nuclear energy option.

A total of 2,161 people were questioned between March 28 and March
30.
----------------

Petition for nuclear-free Wales

BBC Apr 18 - Campaigners handed in the petition at Downing Street.
Anti-nuclear power campaigners have handed in a petition to Downing
Street to "keep Wales nuclear-free". The petition, signed by several
thousand, was taken to London by a delegation including three Welsh
MPs - two Liberal Democrats and one Labour.

The petition calls for "safer, cleaner and cheaper technology" than
nuclear power to be used in Wales.

Prime Minister Tony Blair has said renewable energy could fill some
but not all the UK's energy shortfall.

It is believed Mr Blair favours building new nuclear power stations
to meet the country's energy needs.

The petition will be presented by Liberal Democrat MPs Lembit Opik
(Montgomeryshire), Jenny Willott (Cardiff Central) and Labour MP Nia
Griffith (Llanelli) along with representatives from Welsh
environmental groups.


The Trawsfynydd nuclear plant in Gwynedd is being decommissioned

Organisers said the petition, which pledges "strong opposition" to
nuclear power in Wales, had been signed by between 4,000 and 5,000.

Ms Griffith said:"We simply do not want to down the route of new
nuclear build in Wales.

"It's completely unnecessary. It won't meet the timescale required to
buy in other energies more quickly. And the legacy of nuclear waste
is horrendous."

The Trawsfynydd nuclear power plant in Gwynedd is being
decommissioned, while the Wylfa plant on Anglesey is due to close in
2010 - although local councillors have supported the principle of
building a second one on the island.

Ms Willott said Mr Blair should not "simply impose" a new generation
of nuclear power stations in Wales.

New generation

She added: "Our message to the government is clear: nuclear power is
not the answer to Wales' energy needs.

"Nuclear power is hugely expensive, has a terrible environmental
legacy, and is a huge security risk.

In November, Mr Blair launched a review of UK energy needs which
could pave the way for a new generation of nuclear power stations.

The review is headed by Energy Minister Malcolm Wicks and will report
by the middle of next year.

-------------------------------------
Sandy Perle
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614

Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714  Extension 2306
Fax:(949) 296-1144

E-Mail: sperle at dosimetry.com
E-Mail: sandyfl at earthlink.net

Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/