[ RadSafe ] IEER Memorandum on Tritium

[Maury Siskel]

EPAs words are not a definition, but rather simply imply a value 
judgement. In which case, one would have to ask  'safe for whom and for 
or from what'.  Otherwise safe is only almost synonymous with death. But 
that doesn't work either. Perhaps all we can do is try to remember that 
they are from the government and ....    <g>
Best regards,
Maury&Dog          (maurysis at ev1.net)
================
Sandy Perle wrote:

>On 18 Apr 2006 at 10:29, jjcohen at prodigy.net wrote:
>  
>
>>According to the alleged EPA definition of "safe" as "zero known risk", could anyone please provide a list of human activities that are known to be safe??? 
>>I can't think of any!
>>    
>>
>
>I can't either. Even birth starts out 
>  
>
----------  snipped  --------------