[ RadSafe ] IAEA DACs
JGinniver at aol.com
JGinniver at aol.com
Tue Feb 7 16:29:14 CST 2006
Joel,
I assuming (perhaps rashly) that you are refering to the DAC values given in
Table A-II of the annexe to IAEA Safety Standards Series No. RS-G-1.2
(Assessment of Occupational Exposure due to Intakes of Radionuclides) see:
_http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/P077_scr.pdf_
(http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/P077_scr.pdf)
I belive the key differences which have resulted in the different(in some
cases much lower) values for DACs are:
1) New tissue weighting factors introduced in ICRP60, for example the
weighting factor for bone surfaces drops from 0.03 to 0.01.
2) The model for the respiratory tractin ICRP30 has been replaced with a
more complex physiologically based model. this is described in ICRP66, and
summaries are given in ICRP68 and ICRP78. Where ICRP30 only allowed the
calculation of the average dose to the lungs, the model given in ICRP66 allows
calculation of doses to specific tissues in the respiratory tract. In addition,
for many of the more important radionuclides the ICRP have developed new
systemic models and these are described in ICRP56, ICRP67 and ICRP69.
3) The current value now recommended by the ICRP for the activity median
aerodynamic diameter (AMAD) is now 5 micron, as opposed to the 1 micron value
recommended in ICRP 30.
Finally it should be noted that, as you mentioned, the effective dose limt
has been reduced to 20 milliSv, consequently the limiting factor for all
intakes will now be the stochastic effects.
I hope this helps,
Julian
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list