[ RadSafe ] Dreaming of a Gamma Dose/Exposure Rate Instrument
BLHamrick at aol.com
BLHamrick at aol.com
Fri Jan 13 20:20:19 CST 2006
In my fantasy world, I think that my "dream" instrument would be one that
could reliably and efficiently detect nuclear weaponry, at any distance, with
any shielding intervening, but I expect that shall remain pure fantasy.
And, with that, I am compelled to quote a passage from "American Prometheus,
The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer:"
"When he was asked in a closed Senate hearing in 1946 "whether three or four
men couldn't smuggle units of an [atomic] bomb into New York and blow up the
whole city," he responded pointedly, "Of course it could be done, and people
could destroy New York." To the follow- question of a startled senator,
"What insturment would you use to detect an atomic bomb hidden somewhwer in a
city" Oppenheimer quipped, "A screwdriver [to open each and every crate or
suitcase]."
Alas, we haven't come very far, have we?
Barbara
In a message dated 1/13/2006 9:54:37 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
SDRIMA at mactec.com writes:
I have volunteered to give a presentation at the 2006 HPS Annual Meeting
special session. The special session is tentatively entitled "Radiation
Measurement Instruments for HPs - Looking Back at the Past, and Looking
Ahead to the Future." I've agreed to present on the past, present and
future of gamma dose/exposure rate instruments. To that end, I ask for
your input. I'd like your ideas, thoughts, wishes and dreams on what you
would like to see on future gamma dose/exposure rate instruments. What
features would you like to see? What would make the instruments you use
even better? If you could design the perfect instrument, what would it
be like?
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list