AW: [ RadSafe ] response to allegations and news: Vets plus DUplus the Law

[Rainer.Facius at dlr.de]

"Note that DU is conspicuous by its absence. In fact, DU is not mentioned anywhere in the Araneta et al. paper."

- well, not entirely, Steven.

You find the letters "DU" once on page 246 hidden in introDUction! :-)

Otherwise you are correct! Neither "depleted" nor "uranium" can be found in the text - not even between the lines.

Superb response, congratulations, Rainer




________________________________

Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl im Auftrag von Steven Dapra
Gesendet: Fr 24.03.2006 01:15
An: radsafe at radlab.nl
Betreff: Re: [ RadSafe ] response to allegations and news: Vets plus DUplus the Law



March 23

To all:

         On March 20, James Salsman wrote:

         "The Mississippi study cited is flawed; this one is better, and
from the same time period: "Prevalence of Birth Defects Among Infants of
Gulf War Veterans in Arkansas, Arizona, California, Georgia, Hawaii, and
Iowa, 1989­1993," by M.R.G. "Happy" Araneta, et al., in _Birth Defects
Research (Part A)_, vol. 67, pp. 246­260 (2003.)

http://www.bovik.org/du/mscusn/BD_Infants_GWV_AR_AZ_CA_GA_HI_IA_1989-1993.pdf


(end quote)