[ RadSafe ] Urine tests for uranium exposure typing?
james at bovik.org
Thu Mar 30 19:30:53 CST 2006
Is there anyone who believes that the isotopes of uranium
do not translocate at different rates?
Why doesn't the fact that they do mean that any attempt to
determine the original isotopes of exposure from urine are
likely to be inaccurate?
P.S. To Steve: The Khan et al. (2001) ratios were 1.8 for
offspring of males, and 2.8 for offspring of females, not
1.9 and 2.9 -- do you know something I don't?
More information about the RadSafe