[ RadSafe ] DU Discussed in Chemical & Engineering News
Roger Helbig
rhelbig at california.com
Fri Mar 31 04:49:08 CST 2006
>From a chemistry professor friend who asked that I send this on to RADSAFE. The writer is one of the many who have become influenced by Rokke and friends .. he is not a rabid committed activist that I know .. I have never seen any other postings about DU by him.
Roger
----- Original Message -----
Pass this along to Radsafe. It's from the 3-27-06 issue of Chemical and
Engineering News. I may try to send them something, but I am already embroiled in
another issue of chemical interest. Perhaps there are ACS members on Radsafe
who did not see this:
Military use of depleted uranium
In his letter "Nuclear Fuel Retrieval," James Ingemanson states, "Our current
policy utilizes a small portion of mined uranium and buries the remainder for
eternity" (C&EN, Dec. 5, 2005, page 7). Reality is more complicated than
that. Even though the United Nations Subcommission on the Promotion & Protection
of Human Rights declared depleted uranium (DU) to be a weapon of mass
destruction and against international law, our military continues to use DU (natural
uranium after U-235 is removed) in its weapons, with predictable ghastly
consequences, in Iraq and Afghanistan. Given the half-life of U-238 and the
microscopic aerosols formed upon explosive impact of the DU-containing shells, it comes as no surprise that both civilian and military populations in these areas are
being subjected to a frightening health hazard.
Since space does not permit appropriate coverage of this topic, I encourage
readers to search "depleted uranium" on the Internet and to express their
concern to your senators and representatives.
Frank De Haan
Sun Valley, Calif.
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list