[ RadSafe ] Shielding Software
John_Rich at fpl.com
John_Rich at fpl.com
Wed Sep 13 13:44:43 CDT 2006
If MCNP is still available at a reasonable cost it's a good alternative for
some geometries. We found out that you could use QAD input files with a
little modification to the input stream, which is why MCNP might be useful.
However, deep penetration problems are still best calculated with point
kernel codes.
hope this helps - - jmr
John Rich
(561) 691-2902
Cehn at aol.com
Sent by: To: radsafe at radlab.nl
radsafe-bounces at r cc:
adlab.nl Subject: [ RadSafe ] Shielding Software
09/13/2006 01:51
PM
Does anyone know of a good alternative to MicroShield? Nothing against
uShield, just looking for options for calculating shielded dose rates from
gamma
rays. Anyone know of a non-point/kernel code that's affordable?
Joel I. Cehn, CHP
_jcehn at geosyntec.com_ (mailto:jcehn at geosyntec.com)
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list