[ RadSafe ] three questions

[James Salsman]

Dr. Raabe:

Because you clearly do not wish to admit that almost all HPS
publications deny the reproductive toxicity of uranium, while all of
the relevant peer-reviewed medical publications of the past decade
agree that uranium is a reproductive toxin, and that there are no
viable alternative hypotheses for the increase in birth defects
observed in Basra and in US and UK troops, you have resorted to
attacking my questions themselves.

I note that you were similarly unable or unwilling to answer my
questions about your own research:
  http://lists.radlab.nl/pipermail/radsafe/2007-February/005335.html

If you have any actual evidence contrary to my assertions, I invite
you to present it instead of complaining about being asked.

Sincerely,
James Salsman


On 4/4/07, Otto G. Raabe <ograabe at ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>
>  At 11:16 PM 4/3/2007, James Salsman wrote:
>
> 1.  Are there any
>  2.  Is there any
>  3.  Are there any ********************************
>  THESE QUESTIONS ARE DEVOID OF BASIC LOGIC OR SCIENTIFIC REASON.
>
>  Otto
>
>
>
>  **********************************************
>  Prof. Otto G. Raabe, Ph.D., CHP
>  Center for Health & the Environment
>  University of California
>  One Shields Avenue
>  Davis, CA 95616
>  E-Mail: ograabe at ucdavis.edu
>  Phone: (530) 752-7754   FAX: (530) 758-6140
>  ***********************************************