[ RadSafe ] Child cancer risk higher near nuclear plants: study

[Maury Siskel]

Nobody offered a penny for my thoughts -- so here is my two cents 
worth.  <g>  The scientist/engineer in all of us knows there is nothing 
in that article warranting any response now. Perhaps it warrants 
watching for the report to be published in journal containing the 
details of the design, analysis, and findings. The newspaper article 
tells us worse than nothing -- it attempts to suggest a whole variety of 
problems and fear-mongering; thus, worse than the absence of any 
so-called article. That thing did not even meet common standards of news 
reporting!  What Who When Where How?????

Forget it until some information is available; there are many more 
reasonable events to be concerned with -- take your family out again to 
enjoy some ice cream this evening.
Best,
Maury&Dog    (Maury Siskel   maurysis at peoplepc.com)
___________________
Consider something serious and worthwhile .. such as ... Who was the 
first person to decide, "See that chicken there? I'm gonna eat the next 
thing that comes outta' its butt."
==============================


Bjorn Cedervall wrote:

>Radsafers,
> 
>Any comments to the following?:
>http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071208/hl_nm/cancer_germany_dc
> 
>My personal action only,
> 
>Bjorn Cedervall   bcradsafers at hotmail.com
> 
>  
>