[ RadSafe ] Doyle and Ryan Gulf war reproductive health paper

Syd H. Levine syd.levine at mindspring.com
Sat Feb 3 13:02:36 CST 2007


Gosh, we are in the presence of hacker greatness!  LOD, no less.  Are those 
historical items posted about you correct, James?

I found the piece about hardware hacking the phone lines in the dorm 
interesting.  In typical liberal form, you blame your actions on the lax 
security rather than your own bad character.  Putting this criticism in 
perspective, I was also once a hacker, going way back to before 2600 days. 
The difference between us is that you have never grown up as clearly 
evidenced by your obviously still defective reasoning.

And a final thought.  It is highly unlikely you walked away from conspiracy 
charges in that credit card scam unless you "cooperated" with the 
authorities.  If the story is true, what did you have to do to get out of 
hot water?

This post may generate some criticism, but Mr. Salsman's rude and insulting 
conduct in this forum makes it fair game.

Syd H. Levine
AnaLog Services, Inc.
Phone:  (270) 276-5671
Telefax:  (270) 276-5588
E-mail:  analog at logwell.com
Web URL:  www.logwell.com


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "James Salsman" <jsalsman at gmail.com>
To: "radsafelist" <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2007 1:36 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Doyle and Ryan Gulf war reproductive health paper


> The Doyle and Ryan paper at http://www.bovik.org/du/DoyleRyan2006.pdf
> describes Dr. Kang's report of a 180% increase in birth defects in the
> children of female February, 1991 Gulf War veterans as "modest" on
> page 574.
>
> Are there any other descriptions in the literature or popular press
> where a near-tripling of a serious medical condition is referred to
> "modest"?
>
> I have a several-page letter from Charles Miller of the NRC where he
> tries to defend that characterization at length, but repeatedly
> implies throughout that the increase reported by Dr. Kang was
> described by Doyle and Ryan as "moderate" instead of modest.  You can
> probably find the letter on the NRC's ADAMS document management system
> from their web site.
>
> Sincerely,
> James Salsman
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
> 





More information about the RadSafe mailing list