[ RadSafe ] The hot and cold of history & journalistic credibility

jjcohen at prodigy.net jjcohen at prodigy.net
Sat Feb 3 19:19:58 CST 2007


Jim,
    I just can't agree that the messenger is just in innocent observer in
all this. In selecting which messages to deliver and which to ignore, the
news media  exert a profound influence on public opinion. The "art" of
public relation consists largely of knowing how to work the system and get
the desired message before the public. Unfortunately, those advocating
nuclear power and sound science are not very good at it.    Jerry




----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Muckerheide, Jim (CDA)" <Jim.Muckerheide at state.ma.us>
To: <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; "howard long" <hflong at pacbell.net>; "Bill"
<wwebber2004 at comcast.net>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 11:23 AM
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] The hot and cold of history & journalistic
credibility


Hi Jerry,

Unfortunately, you're blaming the messenger.  They are just carrying the
message that the government agencies and politicians provide to them.

You can blame them for not being "independent thinkers," but the media
didn't "make up" the LNT and associated fear-mongering.

Regards, Jim


>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl
>[mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf Of jjcohen at prodigy.net
>Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 2:26 PM
>To: howard long; Bill; radsafe at radlab.nl
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] The hot and cold of history &
>journalistic credibility
>
>Howard & all,
>    I have a theory to account for what we have observed regarding the
>public's perception of global warming, nuclear power, environment
>degradation, and many other "threats" currently facing humanity.
>Simply stated, I hypothesize that there is a unwritten rule in all
>journalism schools that any student displaying an
>understanding or aptitude
>for science is precluded from graduating and attaining a degree in
>journalism. I can't prove my theory, but it certainly would
>explain a lot
>about what we have been observing. What do you think?
>Jerry Cohen
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "howard long" <hflong at pacbell.net>
>To: "Bill" <wwebber2004 at comcast.net>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
>Sent: Friday, February 02, 2007 10:22 AM
>Subject: [ RadSafe ] The hot and cold of history
>
>
>> Howard Maccabee PhD MD is an LLNL physicist turned radiation
>oncologist
>and founder of Doctors for Disaster Preparedness. I have seen
>him exposed to
>dozens of presentations on global warming by Harvard
>astrophysicist Sallee
>Balliunas, Willy Soon, Springer, Moore, Balling and many
>others. I was his
>guest at an SF presentation featuring Michael Crichton MD, who
>started out
>supporting the movement but found data showed the opposite of what the
>carbon tax collectors claim, thus "The State of Fear" on my
>waiting room
>table.
>>   Howard Long
>
>_______________________________________________
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
>understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
>settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
>




More information about the RadSafe mailing list