[ RadSafe ] ethics in research question
James Salsman
jsalsman at gmail.com
Wed Feb 28 12:23:21 CST 2007
Dear Dr. Long:
Are there any authorities who agree with your assessment that the
reproductive toxicity of uranium is less well-established than that of
foliate deficiency?
Why do you continue to ignore the chemical toxicity of radioactive metals?
Dr. Otto Raabe made the false and embarrassing statement that "all"
uranium oxide gas condenses "instantaneously", and was unable to
answer the questions I asked him about his own research in reply. He
has not denied the chemical toxicity of uranium at all.
Please get back to me when you have attained fifth grade reading
comprehension abilities. In the mean time, please report yourself to
your licensing authorities for gross negligence. Thank you.
Sincerely,
James Salsman
On 2/28/07, howard long <hflong at pacbell.net> wrote:
> 1. Birth defect causes like folic acid (greeens) deficiency and stress
> (uprooted, danger, etc) are well proven. Not so, DU.
> 2.Radiation av 0.4 Sv over 9-20 years was associated with only 1.5/1,000 vs
> 23.0/1,000 expected fetal abnormalities in Taiwan apts, the opposite of what
> Salsman seems to believe.
> 3. The chemical toxicity of DU has been debunked by Otto here.
>
> What is the ethics question, James?
>
> Howard Long MD MPH
>
>
> James Salsman <jsalsman at gmail.com> wrote:
> With regard to the following, would it be ethical or not to establish a
> betting pool on the risk ratio in 2010?
>
> "with medical records verification ... Dr. Kang and his colleagues
> concluded that the risk of birth defects in children of deployed male
> veterans was about 2.2 times that of non-deployed veterans."
> -- Department of Veterans Affairs (2003) "Q's & A's -- New
> Information Regarding Birth Defects" Gulf War Review, vol. 12(1), page
> 10, fifth line from the end in:
> http://www1.va.gov/gulfwar/docs/GulfWarNov03.pdf
>
> Sincerely,
> James Salsman
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
>
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list