AW: [ RadSafe ] SI Units

[Sandy Perle]

On 19 Jan 2007 at 1:29, Franz Schönhofer wrote:

> Scientists who want to question this, like
> Sandy Perle, seem to try to delay this because - in the case of Sandy Perle
> - of obvious commercial interests. (Flame expected.)

If Franz would have actually read my posts for content, instead of 
simply looking for any opportunity to twist and attack my comments, 
he would have noted that I specifically stated that the HPS Standards 
Committee, which I am Chair, has consistently pushed for all US 
Standards to either be published with SI Units, or, to also include 
the SI Units along with the non-SI Units.

As also stated, this is not "Sandy Perle" addressing the SI Units, 
but many scientists in the US (all with apparent problems according 
to Franz). Let me also reiterate that Franz's comment tying my 
opinion to commercial endeavors is unfounded, since we do report in 
SI Units throughout the world where we provide dosimetry.

Flame .. no flmaes from me Franz. I'll simply reply to your comments 
where there is a techncial reason to do so. Other than that, I'll let 
others reply to your comments.

----------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle 
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations 
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc. 
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614

Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306 
Fax:(949) 296-1144

Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/ 
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/