AW: AW: [ RadSafe ] Equal time - a negative view on Nuclear

[Franz Schönhofer]

Thanks Mitchell, for providing another good laugh to me. Please keep on with
your comments, because they provide some funny sunshine in the dark
winter-times we have in Austria. I am also glad about that you force me to
consult my dictionary for your words like "thug" and "banter" because we did
not learn these words at school and I never came across them in my later
life. I mentioned earlier that I am always eager to learn. Of course there
is a good question whether these words are worth learning. 

With my very best regards,

Franz

   

Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
MinRat i.R.
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Wien/Vienna
AUSTRIA


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Mitchell W. Davis [mailto:radiation at cox.net] 
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Jänner 2007 00:22
An: 'Sandy Perle'; radsafe at radlab.nl; 'Ruth Sponsler';
jmarshall.reber at comcast.net; 'Franz Schönhofer'
Betreff: RE: AW: [ RadSafe ] Equal time - a negative view on Nuclear 

Bravo Sandy!!!  I have said on several occasions that Franz's anti-American
and Pro-anybody who is NOT American attitude should not be tolerated on
radsafe.  I have taken many a tongue lashing from that Austrian thug (but I
enjoyed the banter) and I am glad to see others are sick of it as I am.

Mitchell W. Davis, RRPT
Midland, TX  United States of America
(Friend of all Franz's worldwide)

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf
Of Sandy Perle
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 4:58 PM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl; 'Ruth Sponsler'; jmarshall.reber at comcast.net; Franz
Schönhofer
Subject: Re: AW: [ RadSafe ] Equal time - a negative view on Nuclear 

On 23 Jan 2007 at 23:34, Franz Schönhofer wrote:

> This post is really interesting. You write to Ruth "Your points are well
> taken." To me, who supported the opinion of Ruth, you wrote that my
> "statement".... "Ios ludicrous (your spelling)" and you distributed it as
> well to the list. What is the difference - that Ruth is obviously a
> US-citizen and I am not? 

The difference is this:

Ruth questioned why I posted the Jim Bell statement. I provided a reason why
I did, and, I 
also understand Ruth's points.

Franz in his post questioned whether I supported what Mr. bell stated, in
this comment, 
"without making it clear from the first moment, that he had been
asked to distribute it and that he did not support those thoughts." Ruth
didn't question what I 
believed in. Ruth only questioned whether or not I should have posted Mr.
Bell's comments in 
the first place.

I suggest that Franz get off his "anti-everyone" kick if they aren't from
anywhere other than 
the USA. His anti-USA rhetoric is really beneath him. Consider the personal
attack on Mr. 
Suleiman the other day. Mr. Suleiman's birth country, where he was raised
and where he 
lived is of no importance on this list. The attack was quite distasteful,
but that has been the 
norm these days from our Austrian colleague. Franz needs to learn to debate
the issues and 
not attack the messenger. Franz needs to recognize that is someone asks a
question that he 
feels is not an intelligent question, then he needs to recall a time where
he did not know all 
the answers.

Franz is the Simon Cowell of Radsafe.

Sandy Perle
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/