AW: [ RadSafe ] European Union (EU) Drinking Water Limit forTritium

Syd H. Levine syd.levine at mindspring.com
Wed May 23 08:19:34 CDT 2007


Franz is not "persona non gratis" on Radsafe; if he was, we would not be 
seeing his posts at all.  Franz is a bit paranoid, a bit vindictive and 
hateful, and a bit down on most things related to the USA.

He often mentions the delay in his posts, and that could be caused by a 
number of things.  Normal web propagation and/or listserv software behavior 
is pretty unpredictable, and delays are common in posts to reflector mailing 
lists.  Further, if he is using an email account different from the one he 
originally registered on Radsafe, then the moderator must approve each post 
(this happens to me when I slip up and use the wrong email account from time 
to time).  Finally, Franz may have irritated the list owner / moderator with 
his nasty style, and he may have been placed on moderate status.  Only the 
owner / moderator would know for sure, but who could blame him if he has 
placed Franz (and a few others of us) on moderate status?

Syd H. Levine
AnaLog Services, Inc.
Phone:  (270) 276-5671
Telefax:  (270) 276-5588
E-mail:  analog at logwell.com
Web URL:  www.logwell.com

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "H. Westenbrink" <h.westenbrink at amc.uva.nl>
To: "Franz Schönhofer" <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
Cc: "'Leo M. Lowe'" <llowe at senes.ca>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2007 7:47 AM
Subject: Re: AW: [ RadSafe ] European Union (EU) Drinking Water Limit 
forTritium


Can anyone explain to me,
why Franz is on a radsafe list of "persona non grata" (it has nothing
to do with radiation protection). I think Franz has a lot to
contribute.

best regards,
Henk Westenbrink
h.westenbrink at amc.nl # 020-56 65752
RSO
Central B-laboratory (F1-149)
AMC  Amsterdam

----- Original Message -----
From: Franz Schönhofer <franz.schoenhofer at chello.at>
Date: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 11:43 pm
Subject: AW: [ RadSafe ] European Union (EU) Drinking Water Limit for
Tritium

> Dear Leo,
>
> Yes, I am a European collegue and even more important I have been
> working on
> the radioactivity of drinking water for probably twenty years. On
> the other
> hand I am a kind of "persona non grata" on RADSAFE, because my
> messages are
> monitored and some times are distributed on the RADSAFE list up to
> two days
> later. The recent attempt of a US company for recruiting RSO's for
> the US
> Army for duty in Iraq was not at all delayed. So do not be
> surprised, that
> you will receive my mail to you more or less immediately and - if
> at all - a
> second time with a large delay via the RADSAFE list.
>
> The EU drinking water directive has no "limits" for radioactive
> contamination. The indicative dose given excludes - please be
> careful - not
> only T, K-40 and radon, but also radon progeny!!!! I suppose you
> know, that
> Po-210 and Pb-210 have very high dose conversion factors. There is a
> recommendation for the member states to set MPC for Rn-222, Pb-210
and
> Po-210. A few member states have followed this recommendation, the
> Scandinavian ones had them already before in force. They are not
> uniform,but differ from member state to member state.
> Considerations on setting
> MPC's are done in a few EU Member States.
>
> Now to the "Indicative Concentration" of Tritium. Here I have to
> disappointyou -there is (in my opinion) no scientific background
> for the 100 Bq/L.
> There was a severe quarrel between the European Parliament and the
> EuropeanCommission, which lasted for years, concerning the
> indicative concentration
> of tritium. Especially the green fraction of the European
> Parliament did not
> really care about doses, but as is known very well from other
> issues, they
> wanted to reduce the "numbers" to sell this as their success and
> achievementfor protecting the population. They produced numbers of
> 75 Bq/l, to be
> reduced to 25 Bq/l within a few years. Needless to say, that in
> Europe you
> cannot find nowadays any drinking water which would even come
> close to 25
> Bq/l. In Austria all drinking water is below 2 Bq/l.
>
> Having said this, I can only answer to your last question, that
> there is no
> EU dose limit for drinking water. The concept of indicative dose
> is the
> following: In case the indicative dose would be exceeded (very
> unlikely in
> European drinking water supplies), then the competent authorities
> have to
> decide, whether countermeasures are necessary and the situation of
> the water
> supply (nitrate, arsenic, coli-bacteria etc. etc.) has to be taken
> intoconsideration.
>
> I hope I could express the situation in my bad English! Feel free
> to contact
> me again in case of any further questions!
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Franz
>
>
> Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
> MinRat i.R.
> Habicherg. 31/7
> A-1160 Wien/Vienna
> AUSTRIA
>
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]
> Im Auftrag
> von Leo M. Lowe
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Mai 2007 21:59
> An: radsafe at radlab.nl
> Betreff: [ RadSafe ] European Union (EU) Drinking Water Limit for
> Tritium
> Some questions for our European colleagues:
>
> I understand that the EU drinking water limits are based on an
> "indicator dose" of 0.1 mSv/y, excluding tritium, K-40 and radon,
> and
> an indicator parameter of 100 Bq/L for tritium.
>
> What is the basis for the 100 Bq/L value for tritium?  How was it
> derived? Is it just an indicator that non-background sources are
> potentially present?  Is there a readily-available citation that
> describes this?
>
> Also, if 0.1 mSv/y is just an "indicator dose", what is the EU
> dose
> limit for drinking water?
>
> Feel free to respond directly to me.
>
> Regards,
>
> Leo M. Lowe, Ph.D., P.Phys.
>
> SENES Consultants Limited
> llowe at senes.ca
> www.senes.ca
> Tel:  905-764-9380
> Fax: 905-764-9386
>
> This transmission is intended only for the addressee and may
> contain
> PRIVILEGED or CONFIDENTIAL information.  Any unauthorized
> disclosure,
> use or retention is strictly prohibited.  SENES does not accept
> liability for any errors, omissions, corruption or virus in
> contents
> or attachments.  Information is provided for use "as is" by the
> addressee.  Revised documents must not be represented as SENES
> work
> product, without express, written permission of a SENES Director.
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
> settings visit:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
> settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the 
RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: 
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/ 




More information about the RadSafe mailing list