[ RadSafe ] "Do Not Read This If You Are Anti-Nuclear Energy"

Bailly, Helen A Helen.Bailly at icp.doe.gov
Mon Nov 26 08:58:38 CST 2007


True, but is there a well funded, propaganda supported movement afoot to
eliminate sharks?

 

Life is short - Break the rules!  Forgive quickly!  Kiss slowly!  Love
truly! Laugh uncontrollably!... And never regret anything that made you
smile.

 <file:///C:\helen's%20documents\hel-2.JPG>
<file:///C:\Program%20Files\Common%20Files\Microsoft%20Shared\Stationery
\fieruled.gif> 

 

helen Bailly

Radiation Dosimetry Records Unit

CFA-690                  

Mail Stop 4147

(208) 526-5261

 P please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic
Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.  2510-2521, and are solely
intended for the specified recipient and may contain confidential or
privileged information.  This information is confidential.  If you are
not the intended authorized recipient of this information, you are
hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that
any review, dissemination, copying, or the taking of any action based
on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this communication in error, please notify the sender
immediately by e-mail, and permanently delete the original message.

 

 
<file:///C:\helen's%20documents\DOSIMETRY\confidential%20mood%20stamp.jp
g> 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
Behalf Of John Jacobus
Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2007 9:50 AM
To: Steven Dapra; Bob Cherry; radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] "Do Not Read This If You Are Anti-Nuclear
Energy"

 

It is usually more complex than numbers and

statistics.  Consider how many people who are killed

by sharks.  Now ask the first 10 people you meet if

they are afraid of sharks.

 

We are all familiar with cars, electrical outlets,

turning on the gas stoves.  So why should we be afraid

of them?

 

These are not new issues.

 

--- Steven Dapra <sjd at swcp.com> wrote:

 

> Nov. 21

> 

>          Perhaps this is the journalists' way of

> showing us they don't know 

> enough elementary arithmetic to calculate

> proportions.  (Can anyone devise 

> a more plausible explanation?)

> 

> Steven Dapra

> 

> 

> At 06:14 PM 11/21/07 -0600, Bob Cherry wrote:

> >Subject opinion article in the New York Times

> quotes our Bernie Cohen who

> >researched stories by the New York Times about

> different types of accidents

> >between 1974-78 (prior to Three Mile Island):

> >

> >On an average, there were 120 entries per year on

> motor vehicle accidents,

> >which kill 50,000 Americans each year; 50 entries

> per year on industrial

> >accidents, which kill 12,000; and 20 entries per

> year on asphyxiation

> >accidents, which kill 4,500; note that for these

> the number of entries,

> >which represents roughly the amount of newspaper

> coverage, is approximately

> >proportional to the death toll they cause. But for

> accidents involving

> >radiation, there were something like 200 entries

> per year, in spite of there

> >not having been a single fatality from a radiation

> accident for over a

> >decade.

> >

> >Another problem, especially in TV coverage, was use

> of inflammatory

> >language. We often heard about "deadly radiation"

> or "lethal radioactivity,"

> >referring to a hazard that hadn't claimed a single

> victim for over a decade,

> >and had caused less than five deaths in American

> history. But we never heard

> >about "lethal electricity," although 1,200

> Americans were dying each year

> >from electrocution; or about "lethal natural gas,"

> which was killing 500

> >annually with asphyxiation accidents. (Bernard

> Cohen, "The Nuclear Energy

> >Option," pp. 58-59.)

> >

> >

> >

> >The opinion article:

> 

>http://freakonomics.blogs.nytimes.com/2007/11/21/do-not-read-this-if-yo
u-are

> >-anti-nuclear-energy/

> 

> _______________________________________________

> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing

> list

> 

> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have

> read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be

> found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

> 

> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe

> and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/

> 

 

 

+++++++++++++++++++

"If you guard your toothbrushes and diamonds with equal zeal, you'll
probably lose fewer toothbrushes and more diamonds."

- Former national security advised McGeorge Bundy

-- John

John Jacobus, MS

Certified Health Physicist

e-mail:  crispy_bird at yahoo.com

 

 

 
________________________________________________________________________
____________

Be a better sports nut!  Let your teams follow you 

with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvtAbMuh1G1SQtBI7ntAcJ

_______________________________________________

You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

 

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

 

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/




More information about the RadSafe mailing list