[ RadSafe ] CT scans and cancer

[Steven Dapra]

Nov. 29

         Such a speculation would require a degree of sophisticated 
thinking that is seldom (if ever) found on television.  The boob toob is 
not a medium that lends itself to intellectual depth, nor (as a rule) does 
it seek out such depth.

Steven Dapra



At 10:30 AM 11/29/07 -0800, Brennan, Mike  (DOH) wrote:
>Did he speculate on how many of the people who might develop cancers
>could have avoided that fate by dieing of something that could have been
>prevented with the help of the information a CT could have provided?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
>Behalf Of Brunkow, Ward
>Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 6:19 AM
>To: Steven Dapra; radsafe at radlab.nl
>Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] CT scans and cancer
>
>Our highly discussed issue here finally made the cable TV circuit this
>morning with Dr. Sanjae Gupka (? Spelling), CNN Medical Expert. He
>stated that CTs were suspected in 1-3% excess cancers.
>
>W. G. (Ward) Brunkow