[ RadSafe ] [Nuclear News] FPL's nuclear plans could spark fight
Sandy Perle
sandyfl at cox.net
Mon Sep 17 23:21:24 CDT 2007
Index:
FPL's nuclear plans could spark fight
Regulators may vote Tuesday on nuclear plant sale
Chernobyl to get $505m metal cover to stop radiation
Sinuplasty radiation exposure deemed safe
Report faults managers at detection site
Scientists using radiation to prod nature into producing better crops
Da Lat nuclear reactor now burns low-enriched uranium
Firm's Rockville site to handle contract on nuclear-plant analysis
IAEA to help Dhaka build nuclear power plant
----------------------------------------------------
FPL's nuclear plans could spark fight
Florida Power & Light plans to dramatically expand nuclear power
output at Turkey Point -- a project some environmentalists fear would
destroy hundreds of acres of wetlands and consume too much of the
area's already dwindling water supply.
The utility on Monday asked the Florida Public Service Commission for
permission to overhaul and increase generating capacity for two
existing reactors at the South Miami-Dade County site, as well as two
others in St. Lucie County, by 2012.
FPL also announced it intends to seek approval to add two new nuclear
units at Turkey Point by 2025. If approved, that would make the power
complex on the mangrove coastline of Biscayne Bay among the first
sites in the country with four operating reactors.
''That would be one of the largest ones,'' said Ken Clark, regional
spokesman for the Nuclear Regulatory Commission in Atlanta.
FPL President Armando Olivera said the expansion is necessary to
address the state's growing demand for electricity, while also
helping to meet Gov. Charlie Crist's goals for reducing power-plant
pollution linked to global warming.
''We've been generating safe, reliable nuclear power for 35 years,''
Olivera said in a news release. ``This proposal can help supply
additional affordable new energy to Floridians without producing
carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that scientists have
determined can contribute to climate change.''
The PSC filing made formal what has been expected since late last
year, when FPL executives began discussing Turkey Point, the state's
first and oldest nuclear plant, as a leading candidate for major
expansion.
The hunt for a new nuclear site intensified in June when the PSC
rejected a 1,900-megawatt coal-burning plant in Glades County near
Lake Okeechobee. Environmentalists mounted a major campaign against
it, charging the pollution could harm Everglades wildlife and air
quality and exacerbate global warming. Crist, who is campaigning to
reduce statewide greenhouse emissions, also expressed concerns.
Mark Oncavage, a Miami Sierra Club activist, said the utility
shouldn't expect smooth sailing by touting nuclear power as a
''green'' alternative to coal.
''I think there is going to be quite a fight,'' he said.
Environmentalists, echoed by the managers of Biscayne National Park,
already have questioned site plans FPL has filed with Miami-Dade
County, saying the expansion would destroy hundreds of acres of
coastal wetlands and affect South Florida's tight supply of fresh
water. With the reactors powering steam-driven electrical turbines,
Turkey Point ranks among Miami-Dade's largest water users.
''That's one of the biggest problems I see,'' Oncavage said. ``There
is not enough water to build it.''
There also could be heightened concerns from terrorist attacks,
accidents, hurricanes and growing stockpiles of potentially lethal
radioactive waste.
FPL, like most nuclear operators, already is running out of room for
spent fuel rods. With a long-planned federal dump under a Nevada
mountain mired in controversy, the utility intends in the next few
years to start moving the most depleted radioactive fuel into
concrete ''dry storage'' casks on each site.
FPL spokesman Tom Veenstra said state and federal regulators would
address all safety and security issues before approving any new
reactors, a process that could take more than a decade, and the
utility was discussing water and wetlands impacts with county
regulators.
But he stressed that FPL had a solid safety record, elaborate
security and had already withstood a direct hit from Category 5
Hurricane Andrew in 1992.
''We build and design nuclear plants just for that,'' Veenstra said.
The company has said it needs to produce about 28 percent more energy
over the next decade to serve a growing population. Turkey Point's
twin reactors now produce enough power for 450,000 homes.
The nuclear expansion, if approved, would come in two phases. First,
FPL hopes to coax 100 more megawatts from existing generators by
2012. FPL says the Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved more
than 100 similar ''uprates'' since the 1970s, including at both
Turkey Point and St. Lucie.
By 2020, FPL would hope to have two more powerful ''third-
generation'' reactors online, putting out about 3,000 megawatts --
more than twice the energy produced today.
The new reactors would add to the growing uranium-powered energy wave
in the United States, which hasn't approved a new plant since 1973.
The NRC expects to get applications from at least 21 utilities by
2009 to build 32 new reactors nationwide by 2020.
In Florida, Progress Energy is pursuing a nuclear facility in Levy
County and is about a year ahead in the process.
---------------
Regulators may vote Tuesday on nuclear plant sale
Commissioners propose changes to improve deal
A vote on the sale of Point Beach Nuclear Power Plant could come
Tuesday after state regulators debated the transaction Monday for
more than two hours.
Hearing On Tuesday
The Public Service Commission will meet at 10:30 a.m. Tuesday to
consider the Point Beach case. The meeting can be heard on the web.
The three members of the Public Service Commission proposed changes
they said would make the deal better.
The commissioners ended their deliberations so they could review
suggestions each of them offered.
The commission will resume deliberations this morning.
We Energies has agreed to sell the two-reactor nuclear plant to FPL
Energy of Juno Beach, Fla., for $1 billion.
Selling the power plant could lead to better performance than the
plant has seen in recent years under Nuclear Management Co., PSC
Chairman Dan Ebert said.
In addition, selling it could relieve We Energies customers of risks
linked to the nuclear plant because customers wouldn't be responsible
for buying more expensive power during periods when Point Beach is
out of service, he said.
Commissioners agreed they would like to see We Energies and its
customers retain the financial benefits Point Beach would reap if the
U.S. government moves to reduce emissions linked to global warming.
Unlike power plants fueled by coal and natural gas, nuclear plants do
not release any carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.
Carbon dioxide is the leading greenhouse gas, and coal-fired power
plants are a leading source of the gas.
Citing testimony by the energy efficiency advocacy group E4 Inc.,
Ebert said the value of Point Beach generating electricity without
carbon dioxide emissions could be worth $24 million to $240 million a
year.
As it stands now, We Energies and FPL would split the green credits
50-50.
In testimony to the commission, FPL and We Energies argued against
changing the terms of the deal, saying that doing so would reopen the
entire transaction to renegotiation by the utilities.
But the commissioners said they believe the United States will
regulate greenhouse gas emissions at some point.
Commissioner Lauren Azar proposed that We Energies gets all the green
credits tied to Point Beach, while Ebert proposed that We Energies
receives all the credits but that any credits from expanding the
output of Point Beach should be split.
If FPL decides not to proceed with buying Point Beach because of that
change, Azar said, "that tells me that these credits are gold."
E4 had contended that green credits were not being fully accounted
for.
"Considering the very real value of green credits now and in the
future, their forfeiture and the loss of Point Beach, a zero
emissions asset, must be accounted for," said E4 Executive Director
Kathryn Sachs.
--------------
Chernobyl to get $505m metal cover to stop radiation
Ukraine is to cover the site of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor with a
vast metal shelter in a long overdue operation designed to prevent
the further leak of deadly radiation. Officials in Kiev yesterday
said they had hired a French firm to replace the crumbling concrete
sarcophagus that has stood at Chernobyl since 1986 - when it was the
scene of the world's worst ever nuclear disaster.
The new shelter is an arch-shaped metal structure 105m (345ft) tall
and 150m (490ft) long. It will enclose the sarcophagus hastily put up
after the accident. That precarious structure has been leaking
radiation for more than a decade.
"I am convinced that today, possibly for the first time, we can
frankly tell the national and international community that the answer
to the problem of sheltering the Chernobyl nuclear plant has been
found," President Viktor Yushchenko said, according to his
presidential website.
The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development has funded the
$505m deal with a French construction firm, Novarka. The plan is to
eventually dismantle the sarcophagus and the exploded reactor inside
the new shelter.
According to official estimates, the reactor still contains about 95%
of the original nuclear fuel from the plant. There are fears that if
the sarcophagus collapses another cloud of lethal radioactive dust
could escape.
Chernobyl's reactor No 4 exploded on April 26, 1986, spewing
radiation over a large swath of the former Soviet Union and much of
northern Europe. An area roughly half the size of Italy was
contaminated, forcing the resettlement of hundreds of thousands of
people.
Anton Usov, a spokesman for the European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development, said it will take about 1½ years to design the shelter
and another four to build it. Officials also signed a $200m contract
with the US firm Holtec International to build a storage facility for
spent nuclear fuel from the plant's three other reactors, which kept
operating until the station was shut down in 2000.
"The successful implementation of the project depends not only on the
progress of the construction work, but also on the continued
commitment of both the Ukrainian authorities and the international
community," the European bank's president, Jean Lemierre, said in a
statement.
Within the first two months after the disaster, 31 people died from
illnesses caused by radioactivity. But there is no consensus over the
subsequent death toll. A 2005 report from the UN health agency
estimated that about 9,300 people will die from cancers caused by
Chernobyl's radiation. Some groups, such as Greenpeace, insist the
toll could be 10 times higher.
Some 200,000 residents were evacuated from Ukraine alone.
------------------
Sinuplasty radiation exposure deemed safe
WASHINGTON, Sept. 17 A U.S. study found that the amount of radiation
the eye lens is exposed to during balloon sinuplasty is safe.
Balloon catheter dilation of the sinuses, known as balloon
sinuplasty, continues to gain acceptance as an emerging technique for
treating chronic sinusitis, explained Dr. Rakesh K. Chandra, of the
University of Tennessee, in Memphis.
The findings, presented at the American Academy of
Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery Foundation's annual meeting &
OTO EXPO in Washington, show that the lens of the eye can withstand
up to approximately 29 minutes of the fluoroscopic guidance necessary
for the procedure.
The authors used mathematical modeling based on previously published
data to measure the radiation dose. However, Chandra said while this
study indicates the level of radiation exposure is safe, further
research is needed to corroborate these results in actual balloon
sinuplasty.
-------------------
Report faults managers at detection site
WASHINGTON - After $30 million in taxpayer spending, work on a
government project developing high-tech sensors to detect radiation
at ports or border crossings is mired in mismanagement with no clear
way forward, a federal audit said Monday.
The project, slated for completion last February, is being built at
the Energy Department's Nevada Test Site, a huge outdoor testing
facility in the Nevada desert. It is 68 percent done. No work has
been done on it since August 2006, after the money ran out.
The Homeland Security Department's original price tag for the project
was $33 million. As much as $10.5 million more is needed to finish
the job, said the audit by the Energy Department's inspector general.
"Even if an effective fix is implemented, completion of the project
will have been significantly delayed and the cost will have
substantially exceeded original estimates," said the audit.
"More importantly, the delay may impact the nation's testing
capability to detect nuclear and radioactive materials in a variety
of circumstances," it said.
At issue is a project called the Radiological/Nuclear Countermeasures
Test and Evaluation Complex, which is supposed to develop next-
generation sensors to detect radioactive or nuclear materials. The
devices would one day be used for purposes such as keeping weapons
from entering the country at airports or seaports.
Under an interagency agreement, the Homeland Security Department is
handling the project with the Nevada Site Office of the Energy
Department's National Nuclear Security Administration.
Auditors found poor coordination between NNSA's Nevada Site Office
and Homeland Security. The agencies did not formally define their
respective responsibilities until May 2006, more than two years after
the original contractor, Bechtel Nevada, started work on the project.
The degree of miscommunication was so great that Nevada Site Office
officials told auditors that Homeland Security was managing the
project - while Homeland Security officials claimed Nevada Site
Office personnel wouldn't let them talk to Bechtel.
The report also criticized oversight of Bechtel. The company didn't
stay on schedule, but the Nevada Site Office accepted Bechtel's
assurances despite signs of problems.
In July of last year Bechtel was replaced as the contractor by
National Security Technologies LLC, and since then project managers
have performed several reviews and identified weaknesses, the audit
said in its one note of praise.
In a written response, Michael C. Kane, the NNSA's associate
administrator for management and administration, said NNSA agreed
with the report and would work to improve matters.
A spokesman for the Homeland Security Department didn't immediately
return a call for comment, and Bechtel spokeswoman Brenda Thompson
said the company was reviewing the audit.
---------------
UN scientists using radiation to prod nature into producing better
crops
VIENNA (International Hearald Tribune): Pierre Lagoda pulled a small
container from his pocket and spilled the contents onto his desk.
Four tiny dice rolled to a stop.
"That's what nature does," Lagoda said. The random results of the
dice, he explained, illustrate how spontaneous mutations create the
genetic diversity that drives evolution and selective breeding.
He rolled the dice again. This time, he was mimicking what he and his
colleagues have been doing quietly around the globe for more than a
half-century - using radiation to scramble the genetic material in
crops, a process that has produced useful mutants like red
grapefruit, disease-resistant cocoa and premium barley for Scotch
whiskey.
"I'm not doing anything different from what nature does," he said.
"I'm not using anything that was not in the genetic material itself."
Lagoda, the head of plant breeding and genetics at the International
Atomic Energy Agency, prides himself on being a good salesman. It can
be a tough act, however, given wide public fears about the dangers of
radiation and the risks of genetically manipulated food. His work
combines both fields but has nonetheless managed to thrive.
Today in Health & Science
Free of breast cancer, but weighing a mastectomy because of genetic
testsThree 500-year-old Inca children are given a new 'home'Moray
eels: The predator that always bites twice
The process leaves no residual radiation or other obvious marks of
human intervention. It simply creates offspring that exhibit new
characteristics.
Though poorly known, radiation breeding has produced thousands of
useful mutants and a sizable fraction of the world's crops, Lagoda
said, including varieties of rice, wheat, barley, pears, peas,
cotton, peppermint, sunflowers, peanuts, grapefruit, sesame, bananas,
cassava and sorghum.
The mutations can improve yield, quality, taste, size and resistance
to disease and can help plants adapt to diverse climates and
conditions.
Lagoda takes pains to distinguish the little-known radiation work
from the contentious field of genetically modified crops. That
practice can splice foreign genetic material into plants, creating
exotic varieties grown widely in the United States but often feared
and rejected in Europe. By contrast, radiation breeding has made few
enemies.
"Spontaneous mutations are the motor of evolution," Lagoda said in
his office. "We are mimicking nature in this. We're concentrating
time and space for the breeder so he can do the job in his lifetime.
"We concentrate how often mutants appear - going through 10,000 to 1
million - to select just the right one."
Radiation breeding is widely used in the developing world, due
largely to the efforts of the atomic agency, an arm of the United
Nations in Vienna. Beneficiaries have included Bangladesh, Brazil,
China, Costa Rica, Egypt, Ghana, India, Indonesia, Japan, Kenya,
Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru, Sri Lanka, Sudan, Thailand and Vietnam.
Plant scientists say radiation breeding could play an important role
in the future. By promoting crop flexibility, it could help feed
billions of added mouths despite shrinking land and water, rising oil
and fertilizer costs, increasing soil exhaustion, growing resistance
of insects to pesticides and looming climate change. Globally, food
prices are already rising fast.
"It's not going to solve the world food crisis," said J. Neil Rutger,
former director of the Dale Bumpers National Rice Research Center in
Stuttgart, Arkansas. "But it will help."
Though the method was discovered some 80 years ago in the United
States, it is now used mostly overseas, with Asia and Europe the
leading regions.
-----------------
Da Lat nuclear reactor now burns low-enriched uranium
US Ambassador to Vietnam Michael Michalak and Dr. Bui Van Quyen,
chief representative in the south of the Ministry of Science and
Technology at the announcement ceremony.
VietNamNet Bridge - The Vietnam Institute of Atomic Energy has
completed a project to replace highly-enriched uranium in the Da Lat
nuclear reactor with low-enriched uranium.
The project was implemented within a multilateral framework between
Vietnam, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the US and Russia.
Specifically, in March 2007, the National Nuclear Security
Administration (NNSA) under the US Department of Energy signed a deal
with the Vietnam Institute of Atomic Energy in Washington. Under the
deal, the Da Lat nuclear reactor would transfer from using high-
enriched uranium to low-enriched uranium.
Russia´s JSC TVEL company, the Vietnam Institute of Atomic Energy,
and the Service Centre under the NNSA signed a contract on producing
and supplying low-enriched uranium for the Da Lat nuclear reactor.
Accordingly, low-enriched uranium for the reactor in Da Lat is
provided by Russia´s TVEL company under an order placed by the NNSA.
This company also provides low-enriched uranium for the VR-1 reactor
of the Czech Republic in Prague and the nuclear reactor at Libya´s
Tajoura nuclear research centre.
At the same time, a contract was signed among the International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Russia´s SOSNY Company and the Vietnam
Institute of Atomic Energy on bringing unused high-enriched uranium
bars from the Da Lat nuclear reactor (also provided by Russia before)
to Russia.
Those contracts are the completion of commitments in the Vietnam-US
Joint Statement released during US President George Bush´s visit to
Vietnam in November 2006.
At the announcement ceremony of the completion of this project, US
Ambassador to Vietnam Michael Michalak and Dr. Bui Van Quyen, chief
representative in the south of the Ministry of Science and
Technology, praised the successful cooperation of the two sides in
this special project, which has turned the Da Lat nuclear reactor
from burning high-enriched uranium with 36% of U-235 to burning low-
enriched uranium of less than 205 U-235.
The NNSA said that it provided around $2.4 million for this project.
It also supported the upgrade of Da Lat nuclear reactor and other
agencies of Vietnam that use radioactive substances.
Under the witness of the IAEA, the volume of high-enriched uranium at
the Da Lat nuclear reactor was exported to Russia safely.
According to NNSA, Da Lat is the 50th nuclear reactor in the world
that has completed the upgrade. So far, around 500kg of high-enriched
uranium has been transported to Russia.
Through this event, Vietnam confirms its goal of using nuclear power
for peaceful purposes.
The country´s sole nuclear reactor in the Da Lat Nuclear Institute in
Central Highlands Lam Dong province has a capacity of 500 kW. It is
used for training and research purposes.
Vietnam is currently a member of the IAEA and many other
international nuclear organisations like RCA, FNCA. The country has
also signed many bilateral nuclear cooperation agreements with
Russia, India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Bulgaria and Canada.
------------
Firm's Rockville site to handle contract on nuclear-plant analysis
Information Systems Laboratories won a five-year $34 million contract
from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to review applications
submitted by utility companies to build nuclear power plants.
The San Diego-based company said the work will be performed at its
nuclear systems analysis division in Rockville.
The contract was awarded to handle the workload from an increasing
number of companies applying for site and construction approval to
build power plants.
ISL will review applications to build a pressurized water reactor,
called AP1000, designed by Pittsburgh-based Westinghouse Electric Co.
Westinghouse technology is the basis for about half of the world's
operating nuclear plants, including 60 percent of those in the U.S.
As part of the contract, ISL will take stock of the potential
environmental impacts, including site hazards, protection from
radiation.
The company will lead a team of 11 subcontractors including Fairfax-
based ICF International Inc., Eden Prairie, Minn.-based CNS Inc. and
Boulder, Col.-based RockSol Consulting Group Inc.
-------------
IAEA to help Dhaka build nuclear power plant
Dhaka, Sept 18 (PTI) The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)
has assured Bangladesh of providing assistance in setting up a
nuclear power plant to aid Dhaka meet its growing power demand, a
report said here today.
The assurance came when energy adviser of the interim government
Tapan Chowdhury called on deputy Director General and head of nuclear
energy of International Nuclear Energy Authority Yuri Sokolov in
Vienna yesterday, the private UNB news agency reported.
Chowdhury requested the international nuclear power watchdog to
provide support for preparatory works and convince donors to provide
assistance for the Rooppur Power Plant in northwestern Pabna, it
said.
IAEA gave Dhaka a "green light" to explore nuclear power for
electricity generation installing a proposed nuclear energy-run power
plant in northwestern Pabna two months ago.
Bangladesh earlier this month sought Russian cooperation in exploring
nuclear power to meet its growing energy demand while foreign adviser
of the interim government Iftekhar Ahmed Chowdhury visited Moscow.
Earlier reports said South Korea was willing to extend support to
develop the plan undertaken during the pre-independence Pakistan
period.
Bangladesh is now faced with severe power crisis forcing authorities
to ration electricity supply affecting industry as well as public
life amid scorching summer sun.
Officials said against an estimated demand for at least 5,000
megawatts at peak time they struggle to produce 3,600 megawatts while
experts said despite increased budgetary sanctions they saw no
overnight solution to the problem.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Sander C. Perle
President
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306
Fax:(949) 296-1144
E-Mail: sperle at dosimetry.com
E-Mail: sandyfl at cox.net
Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list