[ RadSafe ] Fwd: ruling out uranium vapor with x-rays

[garyi at trinityphysics.com]

This UO3 vapor issue was discredited pretty thouroughly a year or two ago here on Radsafe.  
The fact that you cite an email to support your claim, and then ask, "Do you have any reason 
to doubt those statements?" shows that you wish people to believe you apart from any proof.

Email is not a peer reviewed medium, and wild claims of harm must be proven to exist.  
Asserting claims of harm and demanding that they be proven false is tabloid journalism, not 
science.  For example:  You may be a mind controlled slave of radical left wing conspirators 
bent on controlling the world.

Can anybody prove that is false?  Anybody?  Personally, I'm inclined to believe it.

-Gary Isenhower


On 15 Apr 2008 at 17:51, Dave Blaine wrote:
> 
> Carl Alexander of Battelle has written in email (20 Apr 2006 16:31)
> that, "gaseous UO3 would be the major product of uranium burning in
> air."
> 
> Do you have any reason to doubt those statements?
>