[ RadSafe ] Advection / Diffusion of Radon through Media
Geo>K0FF
GEOelectronics at netscape.com
Thu Aug 21 10:17:51 CDT 2008
Dan, as a geologist you know that we use a gamma signature of the lower
daughter of Uranium to identify and quantify eU in natural rocks. This tag
is 1.76 MeV from Bi-214 and all geologist's gamma spectrum analyzers are set
up to quantify this isotope. Of course if the gaseous radon has escaped the
rock, the lower daughters will no longer be there in the same vicinity of
the decay chain parents.
Obviously a certain amount of radon DOES escape the matrix, as it winds up
in the atmosphere.
It seems to me that in any rock sample, one could accurately measure the
upper chain components, say Pa-234m, then measure the lower daughter Bi-214
and work out a ratio. This is just an idea as I have not looked into any
established methodology for doing this using another pair of upper/lower
constituents.
Regardless of the pair chosen, the measured deficit in the lower progeny
would indicate the migration of the intermediate progeny, either by
emanation or by geochemical leaching. A typical instrument for U analysis
would be a Ludlum Dual Channel Stabilized Analyzer Model 2218 with a 2"dia.
by 1/2" thick stabilized and shielded sodium iodide probe. At least that's
what I use.
Rebound energy of the radon-222 ion does indeed impart significant momentum
to it, as well as the alpha decay particle from the radium-226. This
momentum is shared between the two ions according to their mass. Being much
more massive, the speed of radon is much slower than the alpha particle.
Still it is measured in km/s. It becomes an ion because the atom is sped
away faster than the electrons can follow, so they simple shed off the outer
shell!
Where that radon atom winds up is a matter of too many electrical and
physical interactions to predict, but it should be somewhat easy to measure
the final results using the simple gamma spec methodology mentions.Most ores
and rocks that I have had a chance to examine do indeed have all the lower
daughters, but the exact Secular equilibrium is never the same between
samples from different regions. Each mine, even different parts of the same
mine, are slightly different.
As you have mentions, the mere act of processing the ore/rock, i.e. cutting
a slab, will change the geochemical and physical conditions enough to
completely change the emanation and leach rates!
Certainly a quick GAMMA SURVEY with simplest equipment can indicate the
total (relative to a known sample) amount of inclusions of NORM, many of
which would have the POSSIBILITY of creating radon. (Note: GM tubes
universally reject gammas from K-40 as the energy level is above the usable
range of GM tubes. The efficiency of a particular tube can be measured at
K-40 by using a 50 pound bag of Potassium Chloride Salt Substitute, as sold
at Wal Mart for water softeners. Be sure to close any beta windows first. ).
Also use of a thin window pancake detector will give some idea as to how
much of the NORM is close to the surface. Alphas close to the surface can
easily be removed using a 3X5 card shield. If there are no alphas near the
surface, there will be little likelihood of radon emission ( in my opinion)
If an unusual quantity of NORM is found, then more exacting GAMMA
SPECTROSCOPY is needed to qualify the mix, and a RADON EMANATION test to
check on the release. No inexpensive or easy shortcuts to the latter tests
that I can think of.
These are just thoughts rolling off the top of my head and would certainly
be a staring place in my own investigations.
George Dowell
NLNL
New London Nucleonics Lab
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan W McCarn" <hotgreenchile at gmail.com>
To: "'Radsafe'" <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 7:18 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Advection / Diffusion of Radon through Media
> Hello:
>
> Perhaps this has been done somewhere before: How does one go about
> estimating that component of radon that emanates from a granite or other
> material? There are several factors that I can think of:
>
> 1 - Nature of uranium mineralization: a) contained within minerals e.g.
> zircon, monazite; biotite and b) epigenetic mineralization via solutions
> precipitating U minerals in pore spaces and fractures. Most granites show
> secular equilibrium in the uranium series. Is this a macroscopic or
> microscopic property? Does the 5 MeV or so recoil dislodge the radon that
> far away from the origin in a mineral grain? Since granites are massive
> rock
> bodies, emanation of radon and subsequent decay would / could occur within
> the same granite, except near the margins.
>
> Does the accumulation of alpha decays e.g. U-238, Th-234, U-234, Th-230,
> Ra-226 ⇒ Rn-222 make it more accessible to mobilization? Because U-234 is
> more easily leachable than U-238 (Wyoming Basins, Kazakhstan), this
> suggests
> to me that the Ra-226 has been fairly well dislocated prior to decay to
> Rn-222.
>
> 2 - Dual porosity matrix - the nature of the permeability associated with
> fractures or porous fractions of a material vs. that portion that is
> contained within a mineral grain. I can imagine that if the rock was
> porous
> / permeable enough to be an aquifer, that the radon would advect at the
> same
> rate as the water. This is borne-out by borehole measurements in and near
> sandstone U deposits.
>
> 3 - Distance to a surface (e.g. fracture or actual surface of material)
>
> Empirically, does a 1 or 2 cm slab of uniform composition granite emanate
> at
> the same rate per unit surface area as a 10 cm slab?
>
> Dan ii
>
> Dan W. McCarn, Geologist; 3118 Pebble Lake Drive; Sugar Land, TX 77479;
> USA
> HotGreenChile at gmail.com UConcentrate at gmail.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list