[ RadSafe ] FW: Minimal Threat X-ray
BLHamrick at aol.com
BLHamrick at aol.com
Fri Aug 22 20:09:54 CDT 2008
In the State of California, the applicable rule is the one cited below -
i.e., if it is unlikely that an operator will exceed 500 millirem in one year
(10% of the occupational limit of 5 rem), then monitoring is not required;
however, one should be prepared to demonstrate the basis upon which one
determined that it is unlikely that the person will not be exposed to greater than 500
millirem in one year (excluding background and medical exposures).
Barbara L. Hamrick
In a message dated 8/21/2008 5:46:15 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
M.Schouwenburg at tudelft.nl writes:
Forwarded message (on behalf of Justin Harris).
(Reason for forwarding: message was filtered out by the server because
it contained an image as background. Images are not accepted because of
security policy.)
-----------------------------------------------
I am curious if anyone here knows the rules for the State of California
regarding minimal threat X-ray machines. I know here in Texas that
operators of these devices are exempt from the personnel monitoring
requirements. Does the CA regulations state this or do you have to use
the exemption of 10% of 5,000 mR/yr. to satisfy this requirement? If
anyone knows, could you steer me in the right direction as far as a
reference. Thanks in advance.
**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel
deal here.
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list