[ RadSafe ] "exposure" to radiation in other languages

[Wright, Will (CDPH-PSB)]

The word dose is appropriate for specific exposures, even
"underexposed".

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
Behalf Of HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 10:46 AM
To: Ansari, Armin (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH); radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] "exposure" to radiation in other languages

"Overdose" should replace most use of  "Exposure" to ionizing radiation,
since everyone is constantly "exposed" from his own K40,
cosmic rays, etc. 

The same should be done with chemicals, since trace minerals 
largely eliminated from purified foods (like selenium - diabetes,
lithium - hyperactivity, etc) are also ubiquitous (all around) 
but often deficient for best health - as with ionizing radiation.

Howard Long


-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Ansari, Armin (CDC/CCEHIP/NCEH)" <asa4 at cdc.gov> 

> Dear radsafe colleagues, 
> 
> As you are well aware, we always have difficulty communicating the 
> concept of "exposure" to non-radiation audiences in plain English.
This 
> is because the word "exposure" in case of chemical and biological
agents 
> means coming in contact with something - similar to how we use 
> "contamination". Exposure to radiation of course means just that, no 
> contamination. This distinction is second nature to us, but very 
> difficult to get across even to a highly-educated audience. We find
the 
> word "irradiation" works better than exposure, but so much of our 
> technical literature and fact sheets still use the word exposure. 
> 
> I was wondering if a similar difficulty is encountered in languages 
> other than English. What words are used for "exposure" and 
> "contamination" and if the word used for exposure to chemicals or 
> biological agents creates the same communication issues in those 
> languages. 
> 
> If you can reply to me off-line with information about any other 
> languages you know, I would appreciate it very much, and I would later

> share a summary with the group. 
> 
> Thanks in advance! 
> 
> Armin 
> 
> 
> _________________________ 
> Armin Ansari, PhD, CHP 
> Radiation Studies Branch, EHHE, NCEH 
> Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 
> Atlanta, GA 30341-3717 
> Phone: 770-488-3654 
> FAX: 770-488-1539 
> asa4 at cdc.gov 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list 
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
understood the 
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html 
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: 
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/ 
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/