[ RadSafe ] query
Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com
Wed Dec 10 21:47:14 CST 2008
"integrity of the elected officials"
As Jackie Gleason would have said, "Har de har, har, har." (I
believe that is a close approximation.) Yeah, you're right, Barbara ---
good luck.
Steven Dapra
At 09:30 PM 12/10/08 -0500, BLHamrick at aol.com wrote:
>Actually, there are frequently mechanisms in place (via state constitutions,
>state legislative rules, et al.) that ostensibly are in place to keep bills
>"clean;" however, these mostly rely upon the integrity of the elected
>officials to self-police the legislative process. Good luck with that,
>eh? (Can
>anyone pronounce Governor Blagojevich?)
>
>Barbara
>
>
>In a message dated 12/10/2008 12:18:40 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
>Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV writes:
>
>Using voting records to tell how a politician feels about a subject is
>almost impossible. Almost any bill with have so many different,
>sometimes contradictory, elements and amendments that muddy the water (I
>believe intentionally, in some cases) so that incumbents can claim, or
>their opponents can charge, to hold almost any position. I looked at
>one of the bill you linked to, and it literally had money going to
>projects from one end of the country to the other; Maine to California.
>
>
>One of the fundamental changes we need to get our economic house in
>order is a mechanism to keep bills clean and to the point, rather than
>use them a rack to hang unrelated pork on. But I don't expect to see
>that any time soon.
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list