[ RadSafe ] NYC Proposal to Permit Radiation Detectors
Steven Dapra
sjd at swcp.com
Mon Jan 7 20:34:16 CST 2008
Jan. 7
New York City went over the edge a long time ago.
To answer your question, the germane section of the proposed
ordinance is 10-802. The germane portion reads:
"10-802 Permits for possession or deployment of biological, chemical and
radiological detectors.
"a. It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or deploy a biological,
chemical or radiological detector in the city of New York unless such
person holds a valid permit therefor, provided that the commissioner in his
or her discretion may exclude by rule any class or type of biological,
chemical or radiological detector that shall not require such permit
because requiring a permit therefor would not further the purposes of this
chapter.
"b. This section shall not apply to biological, chemical and radiological
detectors:
"(1) possessed or deployed by the department of health and mental hygiene,
the fire department, or any other city agency authorized by the
commissioner to possess or deploy a biological, chemical or radiological
detector without a permit; . . . . "
Presumably what happened is that the author(s) of the proposed
ordinance either forgot about (or didn't know about) the NY State Lab and
the Federal agencies. The proposed ordinance need only be re-written so
that the section "shall not apply" to detectors 'possessed or deployed by
any municipal, county, state, or federal government agency in the United
States.' Governments typically make themselves exempt from their own
laws. The author(s) of the proposed ordinance somehow managed to forget
about all the other government agencies that might find it necessary to
deploy detectors within the city limits of New York City.
NYC could provide some comic relief by passing the ordinance as
written, and then having NYPD arrest NY State Lab employees, and Federal
employees who brought un-permitted detectors into NYC. Or, NYC could
require all other government agencies to obtain permits for the detectors
they wish to bring into the city. I doubt that the either of these will
happen. The other government agencies will, of course, receive blanket
exemptions via a re-write of the proposed ordinance.
Steven Dapra
At 03:20 PM 1/7/08 -0500, Edmond Baratta wrote:
>It appears that the City of New york has gone over the 'edge'. Many
>Federal agencies use 'radiation detectors' in their inspections and
>surveillance at the borders, ports and airports. The NY State Lab has
>portable radiaiton surveillance detectors. Does this mean they can't take
>them into the City? Is this going to be a means of eventually obtaining
>more 'funds' when they decide to charge Fees?
>
>Ed Baratta
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list