[ RadSafe ] Dx X ray and Early Prostate Cancer (veg lack)

[HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net]

Thanks, Roy. 
Next to the Nottingham article is this:

Broccoli and Other Vegetables Linked with Decreased Risk of Aggressive Prostate Cancer 

Indeed, my injury-prone biker, hang glider and other risk sport friends and patients are those least likely to eat their cabbage family veggies - a common cause (vs cause-effect) for the "injury and digestive problem X-rays" associated with early prostate cancer.

My palmRad readings are:
Pleasanton CA office                     0.014 mR/hr
My chair (thoriated welding rods)  0.0.45
Phoenix Hilton room                       0.020
   "  granite sink                              0.025 
Palo Verde site fence (in bus)         0.014
   "      "   lecture hall                       0.012
  ''      "   passing spent fuel casks    0.011
   "     "     "    reactor #3 (in bus)     0.012
"Denver   (read somewhere)           0.065"

I'd like my prostate to get more radiation, like Denver with low cancer rate.

Howard Long

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: ROY HERREN <royherren2005 at yahoo.com> 

> Web address: 
> http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/07/080715093737.htm 
> Possible Link Found Between X-rays And Prostate Cancer 
> ScienceDaily (July 15, 2008) — Researchers at The University of Nottingham have 
> shown an association between certain past diagnostic radiation procedures and an 
> increased risk of young-onset prostate cancer — a rare form of prostate cancer 
> which affects about 10 per cent of all men diagnosed with the disease. 
> The study, the first of its kind to report the relationship between low dose 
> ionising radiation from diagnostic procedures and the risk of prostate cancer, 
> was funded by the Prostate Cancer Research Foundation (PCRF) and is part of the 
> UK Genetic Prostate Cancer Study (UKGPCS).The study showed that men who had a 
> hip or pelvic X-ray or barium enema 10 years previously were two and a half 
> times more likely to develop prostate cancer than the general population. And 
> ----- Original Message ---- 
> From: "HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net" 
> To: "Michael, Joey L" ; radsafe at radlab.nl 
> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 4:57:58 PM 
> Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] HPS "Radiation Answers" Website 
> (Sent to that excellent rad info site) 
> 
> To persuade the public, as with sunshine (ultraviolet wave-length radiation) 
> needed for vitamin D, we must inform about ionizing radiation BENEFIT 
> (hormesis),  to motivate (not only absence of harm). 
> Put anti-nucs on the defensive for withholding benefit from the public,harming 
> the public by depriving of an "essential trace energy" (Cameron), like depriving of 
> sunshine and vitamin D. . 
> 
> Thousands of studies support greater longevity (RR 0.76 in NSWS – Cameron) and 
> much less cancer (RR < 0.20 Taiwan apt. study, Chen, Luan et al). 
> 
> See www.ddponline.org, www.oism.org etc. 
> 
> Howard Long 
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: "Michael, Joey L" 
> 
> > This may be the best item ever posted to radsafe. The information 
> > contains the three C's - complete, concise, and coherent. 
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message----- 
> > From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On 
> > Behalf Of Miller, Mark L 
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2008 3:30 PM 
> > To: 'radsafe at radlab.nl' 
> > Subject: [ RadSafe ] HPS "Radiation Answers" Website 
> > 
> > 
> > http://www.radiationanswers.org/#looper 
> > 
> > Put this link on your browser's "favorites". It has some good, simple 
> > information that is useful for all of us at a moment's notice.