[ RadSafe ] Uranium and genotoxicity
sjd at swcp.com
Sat Jun 7 01:28:33 CDT 2008
James doesn't need any evidence. He said it, that makes it true.
At 12:41 PM 6/7/08 +1000, Brent Rogers wrote:
>Regarding moles, do you have any evidence that uranium in the soil has any
>effect whatsoever on a mole's survivability? Considering everything those
>creatures have to live with, primarily their place in the food chain, I
>surmise that U in the soil they live in is a vanishingly small factor.
>But of course, I can't prove this, so following on from how you've argued
>every other point, it must mean that moles are dying from U exposure left
>and right. However, I haven't seen anything in the scientific literature
>that reports a high level of birth defects among their population.
>From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf
>Of James Salsman
>Sent: Saturday, 7 June 2008 11:31 AM
>To: bcradsafers at hotmail.com; radsafelist
>Subject: [ RadSafe ] Uranium and genotoxicity
>Dear Dr. Cedervall,
>Your point is not valid. The fact remains that increasing exposure to
>uranyl cause an increase in birth defects. Do you deny that?
>Do you wish humans to have the same survivability as moles?
>Is your understanding of DNA biology and teratology what passes for
>normal in the Swedish health physics community?
More information about the RadSafe