[ RadSafe ] Uranium and genotoxicity

Steven Dapra sjd at swcp.com
Sat Jun 7 02:02:57 CDT 2008

June 7

Greetings to one and all:

         Now that I have stopped laughing --- in reply to my message, James 
sent me a private e-mail asking me if I am an adult.  Would anyone care to 
offer some advice on what my answer should be?

Steven Dapra

At 12:26 AM 6/7/08 -0600, Steven Dapra wrote:
>June 7
>         I'll be glad to deny it until you (James) present some evidence 
> to support your assertion.  If your evidence for this is as substantial 
> as your evidence that DU causes birth defects we have nothing to worry about.
>         With respect to survivability, do you mean survival in the global 
> economy, or do you mean survival in a hole in the ground?
>         Your final question is a gratuitous and malicious insult.  What's 
> your problem, James?  Have you no sense of decency at long last?
>Steven Dapra
>At 06:31 PM 6/6/08 -0700, James Salsman wrote:
>>Dear Dr. Cedervall,
>>Your point is not valid. The fact remains that increasing exposure to
>>uranyl cause an increase in birth defects.  Do you deny that?
>>Do you wish humans to have the same survivability as moles?
>>Is your understanding of DNA biology and teratology what passes for
>>normal in the Swedish health physics community?
>>James Salsman
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
>the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
>visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/

More information about the RadSafe mailing list