[ RadSafe ] ALARA, BRC ,& regulatory self-interest
sperle at mirion.com
Tue Jun 24 13:21:59 CDT 2008
> Lots of people make a good living regulating the nuclear industry.
Most of this effort is directed toward further reducing radiation doses
that are already quite low. I have heard many explanations
of why the BRC concept was rejected, but I believe that self-interest
was the primary reason. Nobody wants to kill the goose that lays
the golden eggs. Jerry<
Sad, but true! A realistic BRC value would be appropriate. In essence,
the NRC does have many instances of BRC. The 10% of dose limits in 10
CFR 20.1501 that requires personnel monitoring, thresholds for public
dose, thresholds for surveys, etc. Why they did not implement for ALARA
considerations was a big mistake.
So we agree, I think!
Sander C. Perle
Dosimetry Services Division
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
+1 (949) 296-2306 (Office)
+1 (949) 296-1144 (Fax)
Mirion Technologies: http://www.mirion.com/
PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOTICE: This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for use by the addressee and may contain proprietary information of Mirion Technologies and/or its affiliates. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message, delete the original message and all attachments from your computer, and destroy any copies you may have made. Thank you.
More information about the RadSafe