[ RadSafe ] Re: relevance of coffee to radiation
Maury Siskel
maurysis at peoplepc.com
Fri May 30 21:54:40 CDT 2008
http://www.fortfreedom.org/p22.htm
First paragraph follows; link leads to complete paper.
Maury&Dog ....
============================
THE MYTH OF PLUTONIUM TOXICITY
Bernard L. Cohen (1/3/1989)
By Bernard L. Cohen, Department of Physics, University of
Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15260.
(From Karl Otto Ott and Bernard I. Spinard, eds. Nuclear Energy
(New York: Plenum Press, 1985), pp. 355-365)
[Kindly uploaded by Freeman 10602PANC]
Plutonium is constantly referred to by the news media as ``the
most toxic substance known to man.'' Ralph Nader has said that a
pound of plutonium could cause 8 billion cancers, and former
Senator Ribicoff has said that a single particle of plutonium
inhaled into the lung can cause cancer. There is no scientific
basis for any of these statements as I have shown in a paper in
the refereed scientific journal Health Physics (Vol. 32, pp.
359-379, 1977). Nader asked the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to
evaluate my paper, which they did in considerable depth and
detail, but when they gave it a ``clean bill of health'' he
ignored their report. When he accuses me of ``trying to detoxify
plutonium with a pen,'' I offered to eat as much plutonium as he
would eat of caffeine, which my paper shows is comparably
dangerous, or given reasonable TV coverage, to personally inhale
1000 times as much plutonium as he says would be fatal, or in
response to former Senator Ribicoff's statement to inhale 1000
particles of plutonium of any size that can be suspended in air.
My offer was made to all major TV networks but there has never been a
reply beyond a request for a copy of my paper. Yet the false
statements continue in the news media and surely 95% of the public
accept them as fact although virtually no one in the radiation
health scientific community gives them credence. We have here a
complete breakdown in communication between the scientific community
and the news media, and an unprecedented display of
irresponsibility by the latter. One must also question the
ethics of Nader and Ribicoff; I have sent them my papers and
written them personal letters, but I have never received a reply.
==============================
Mark Sonter wrote:
> Was it not Bernie Cohen who a generation ago pointed out that caffeine
> was one tenth as toxic as plutonium...?? And offered to drink a mug
> of both to prove some point (probably in response to needling from
> Gofman or Sternglass or Caldicott or some other cheer-chaser....)
>
> Mark Sonter
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list