AW: AW: [ RadSafe ] Benefit/Harm from U.S. Army in Afghanistan

Sun Nov 2 16:51:12 CST 2008

Dear Steven,

Thank you so much for your information. I apologize for the misunderstanding
of the title of the Graham Green - book: The correct title is "The quiet
American". It describes anyway a very naive American who accepts in nowadays
Vietnam anything leading to the death of natives, if it only is in the
interest of his country. He has not the slightest scrupels to take the
girlfriend of the narrator, who had saved his life. 

I have returned this afternoon from three weeks in Marokko. Fortunately I
did not meet any ugly Americans, ugly Germans or - worst of all - ugly
Austrians, only very nice people, mostly from France and Spain. Ugliness
seems to be restricted to certain parts of a country or rather of a city.
The further the places are away from tourist centers, the better the
communication is. 

Fortunately the average population has no force to start a nuclear war. What
frightens me on this thread is, that some persons think they are entitled to
claim nuclear attacks on some countries.

Best regards,

Franz

Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
MinRat i.R.
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Wien/Vienna
AUSTRIA

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] Im Auftrag
von Steven Dapra
Gesendet: Sonntag, 02. November 2008 23:10
An: radsafe at radlab.nl
Betreff: Re: AW: [ RadSafe ] Benefit/Harm from U.S. Army in Afghanistan

Nov. 2

         According to Wikipedia, “ugly American” is an epithet used to 
refer to perceptions of loud, arrogant, demeaning, thoughtless and 
ethnocentric behavior of American citizens mainly abroad, but also at 
home.  Although the term is usually associated with or applied to 
travellers and tourists, it also applies to US corporate businesses in the 
international arena.”  (citations omitted)  Wikipedia invokes the Encarta 
dictionary and Dictionary.com as giving similar definitions.

         My sister (who was born and raised in the United States) traveled 
in Europe frequently between approximately 1980 and 2000.  She and her 
husband lived in West Germany for some five years in the 1990s.  She told 
me once that during her travels she had personally observed many 
loud-mouthed, demanding, and arrogant Americans.

The book “The Ugly American” (1958) was written by William Lederer and 
Eugene Burdick.

         The link to the Wikipedia article is 
<ttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ugly_American>.  The site has a summary of the 
book.  I read it over 40 years ago, however I can remember virtually none 
of it and hence will not comment on it.

         Franz makes a few legitimate points, however at present I'm not 
going to address any of what he wrote.

Steven Dapra

At 07:30 PM 11/2/08 +0100, Franz Schönhofer wrote:
>RADSAFERs,
>
>I try to comment on Howard Longs political excursion from a context
>including radioactivity and nuclear topics - they are involved indeed and I
>hope that Marcel accepts this opinion.
>
>Reading Howard Longs bla-bla about "liberation, freedom, democracy, net
gain
>for the US, "prosperity" (for whom?)" is annoying and only shows that he
has
>not the slightest clue about the situation of states, their infrastructure,
>the living conditions of their inhabitants, diseases, poverty, risk for
life
>etc. Etc. Howard Long is a typical species called "The Ugly American", a
>term created to my knowledge by Graham Greene in one of his books, where he
>gives an excellent characterisation of this type of American set against
the
>background of the French war in Indochina. Needless to say that I have
>during my many visits in the USA not encountered any of these "ugly
>americans" personally, but judging from the press and its description of US
>politicians and of course Howard Long I know, that they exist. Needless to
>say that people I meet are usually not of the lowest classes. But it was
>amazing during my visit to my beloved South West last October, that most
>people I met at the cultural and outstanding landscape sites started to
>complain about the then and still present administration, without any
>provocation from my side. Here on RADSAFE I read about proposals to attack
>China, Iran, Cuba and North Korea. Unbelievable - shame on you!
>
>I am not going to react on the "benefits" for the USA, but I have noticed
>that a so called "radiological threat" has been used extensively by the US
>administration to spread fear among US citizens and to gain support for the
>most suppressive actions. All those nonsensical actions and the waste of
>money for "surveillance" (which actually has another purpose!!!!), which
are
>obviously there only to scare people and to put them into a state of
>insecurity. Only today morning in Rabat, the capital of Marocco they took
>away at the airport from me a very expensive tiny scissor for nails, about
>three centimeters long without handle.
>
>The possible consequences of a "dirty bomb" have been discussed extensively
>on RADSAFE and except some hardliners agreed that the damage of this would
>be mostly the conventional explosive - but still we read on RADSAFE about
>the terrible threat of dispersion of some radionuclides like Co-60 or
>iridium.
>
>Using this irrational fear mongering with radionuclides or nuclear
material,
>combined with ultra-nationalistic ideas is deeply despicable. I hope I made
>myself clear Mr. Howard Long.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Franz
>
>Franz Schoenhofer, PhD
>MinRat i.R.
>Habicherg. 31/7
>A-1160 Wien/Vienna
>AUSTRIA
>
>
>-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
>Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] Im
Auftrag
>von HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net
>Gesendet: Mittwoch, 29. Oktober 2008 17:19
>An: Peter Bossew; Radsafe Message
>Betreff: Re: [ RadSafe ] Benefit/Harm from U.S. Army in Afghanistan
>
>Radsafe pertinence of this topic is risk of radioactive attack on USA, -
>need for HP preparation..
>
>  I respond to Peter and Steven (and the U Tube sarcastic fiction) with
>gratitude that threatened attacks on USA have not occurred following so far
>successful (incomplete) Afghan Liberation and Iraqi Freedom - wars designed
>primarily to destroy alQaeda operations, but also hoping that democracy
>there will give freedom, trade, prosperity - disincentive to attack us.
>
>Not yet as feasible are the liberation (and destruction of USA or Europe
>attack sources) in China, Iran, Cuba and N Korea. Hopefully, commerce
>self-interest in China (now dependent on USA prosperity) will effectively
>dampen imposition of failed Marxism-Maoism.
>
>USA carbon fuels are as plentiful as in the Middle east, but politically
>restricted by fears that should go away (glaciers now enlarge).
>Big Oil (most monopolistic where government-owned) will have less influence
>with the 45 nuclear plants encouraged by the more free-market Presidential
>campaign.
>
>Howard Long

[edit]

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/