Fw: Re: [ RadSafe ] PNAS Article: Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in Patched . . .

[John Jacobus]

As I mentioned below, I find your question ironic.

+++++++++++++++++++
It is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational results that are put forward until they are confirmed by theory. 
Arthur Eddington 


-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com

--- On Wed, 9/3/08, HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net <HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net> wrote:

From: HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net <HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] PNAS Article: Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in Patched . . .
To: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Date: Wednesday, September 3, 2008, 12:32 PM



John,
I will confirm that we are talking about the same thing when I receive your offered fax of the article at
925-846-4524.
 
Thank you, Howard long
 
-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com> 




You do not know what the discussion is about?  I hope you get the irony.

+++++++++++++++++++
It is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational results that are put forward until they are confirmed by theory. 
Arthur Eddington 


-- John
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com

--- On Tue, 9/2/08, HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net <HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net> wrote:

From: HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net <HOWARD.LONG at comcast.net>
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] PNAS Article: Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in Patched . . .
To: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Date: Tuesday, September 2, 2008, 12:08 PM



John, to be sure I am reading what you are, please fax it to 925-846-4524.
 
Thanks, 
Howard long
 
-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com> 

> If anyone is interested in a copy of this article please contace me directly. 
> 
> Mancuso M, et al.,"Oncogenic bystander radiation effects in Patched heterozygous 
> mouse cerebellum," PNAS, August 26, 2008, Vol. 105, No. 34, Pages 12445–12450 
> 
> I think that is really a first rate experiment demonstration the bystander 
> effect in vivo. 
> 
> As a side note, scatter radiation is NOT associated with the response observed. 
> Once again, Dr. Long, it is important to READ the literature, unless jumping to 
> conclusions is the only exercise you get. 
> 
> 
> +++++++++++++++++++ 
> It is also a good rule not to put overmuch confidence in the observational 
> results that are put forward until they are confirmed by theory. 
> Arthur Eddington 
> 
> -- John 
> John Jacobus, MS 
> Certified Health Physicist 
> e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com 
> 
> 
> 
>