[ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise

Thu Dec 10 14:40:28 CST 2009

I believe it was Saddam who fabricated evidence, the Iranian, French, British, German, Israeli and even Russian secret services all THOUGHT he had WMD... BECAUSE Saddam WANTED IRAN to think so... (of course, this 'history' was all re-written by the GWB haters and those trying to get on the good side of Jihad).  Monday morning quarterbacking doesn't change what the facts were on Sunday Morning.  The Taliban/Alkaseltzer crowd wouldn't have been empowered had it NOT been for GWB's 2 predecessor's first abandoning and then ignoring Afghanistan... no wonder 'they' hated 'us'... 

As for US presidential fabrication, I believe it was Presdent WJC who fabricated a weapons factory to bomb, just to cover up a stained dress... And let's not even start with the whole birth certificate thing...   Not that I'm defending GWB, he willingly went along with all the bogus spending, just like his father went along with the bogus taxing...  

BHO has already stated under his plans "electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket"... does that sound like he's for ANYTHING like nuclear???  Maybe he'll change his tune when IBEW and UWUA fall under SEIU and Andy Stern... So much for 'Hype and Cheat'!

But believing 9-11 was a conspiracy is dumber than believing AGW is true, talk about using your a$$ over your brains.
So much for AGW concensus...
http://www.newsmax.com/insidecover/gray_global_warming/2009/12/08/296137.html?s=al&promo_code=92E7-1

SOLUTIONS... Absolute, Binding, RETRO-ACTIVE Constitutional Term Limits
Galt/Patton 2012, 2016, 2020, 2024... (only in my dreams)

And Franz, take the time to look up the abreviations...

radmax

-----Original Message-----
>From: "Riely, Brian P." <brian.riely at ngc.com>
>Sent: Dec 10, 2009 2:03 PM
>To: "Flowerday, Scott" <scott.flowerday at dhs.gov>, radsafe at radlab.nl
>Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise to	passcleanenergy	bill
>
>he has not fabricated any evidence to start any new wars 
>
>Wow!!  Are you really that gullible?  Do you also believe Bush blew up
>the World Trade Center?
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
>Behalf Of Flowerday, Scott
>Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 1:47 PM
>To: Perle, Sandy; garyi at trinityphysics.com; radsafe at radlab.nl
>Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise to
>passcleanenergy bill
>
>It might be good to quit drawing generalizations ("the majority of
>Democrats").  Politics and science do not mix.  Pro-nuclear Republicans
>elect representatives that aren't smart enough to comprehend evolution
>(or they are smart enough but just not honest).  Environmental Democrats
>aren't smart enough to understand the benefits of nuclear power with
>respect to the environment.  I have decided that there is too much
>stupidity on both sides of the aisle to embrace either party and try to
>figure out which candidate will actually cause the least amount of harm.
>Considering the eight years prior to electing President Obama, my
>decision to vote for Obama was fairly easy.
>
>As far as showing Franz that there has been positive change under Obama,
>I would suggest that the best evidence to date (that there has been
>positive change) is that he has not fabricated any evidence to start any
>new wars and seems to be intent on finding a way to end the ones that he
>inherited.
>
>Scott 
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
>Behalf Of Perle, Sandy
>Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 12:18 PM
>To: 'garyi at trinityphysics.com'; 'radsafe at radlab.nl'
>Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise to pass
>cleanenergy bill
>
>Hi Gary,
>
>I don't disagree at all that Obama and the majority of Democrats are
>anti-nuclear. The purpose of providing the article was to address
>Franz's request is there anything that shows anything positive from
>Obama. While they are still not pro, at least this was a concilatory
>copmment from the administration. One can't deny that. However, actions
>do speak louder than words, so we'll see (I'm not holding my breath)!
>OPne last thpught, any Cabinet member when speaking to Congress or
>elsewhere, generally is speaking for the President, and the fact that
>Chu came from the Department of Energy, I have more confidence in his
>words when spoken.
>
>But you and I are generally in full agreement.
>
>Regards,
>
>Sandy
>
>-----------------------------------
>Sander C. Perle
>President
>Mirion Technologies
>Dosimetry Services Division
>2652 McGaw Avenue
>Irvine, CA 92614
>
>+1 (949) 296-2306 (Office)
>+1 (949) 296-1144 (Fax)
>
>Mirion Technologies: http://www.mirion.com/
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
>Behalf Of garyi at trinityphysics.com
>Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 9:45 PM
>To: radsafe at radlab.nl
>Subject: [ RadSafe ] Obama makes NO nuclear compromise to pass clean
>energy bill
>
>That wasn't Obama doing the endorsing, it was the energy secretary.
>There is a huge
>difference between sending a surrogate and saying something yourself.
>And if you read what
>was said, even the secretary promised....nothing.  Closing Yucca, imho,
>speaks louder than this "endorsement by association".  I've looked, and
>I can't find a single thing that this administration has done to advance
>nuclear power, despite the overwhelming emphasis it puts on clean energy
>
>If I were president, and I really did "...want to recapture the lead on
>industrial nuclear power"
>I would actually say so myself.  Further, I would be pushing congress to
>make legislative changes to accomplish that.  Nothing like that is
>happening.  No, in the context of the political situation, Chu's
>statements are really meant to entice more support for climate
>legislation, not nuclear power.  Its not even a carrot - its a
>suggestion of a carrot, a shimmering global warming mirage of a carrot.
>Kind of like the EPA's threat of "command and control"
>regulation of CO2 is a stick (but the stick is real).
>
>Even if the big 0 really does like nuclear power, his core political
>base is simply too green for him to risk allowing real progress on it.
>
>-Gary Isenhower
>
>
>On 9 Dec 2009 at 16:56, Perle, Sandy wrote:
>
>From:                   "Perle, Sandy" <SPerle at mirion.com>
>
>Franz,
>
>Here is "one" example, not just by words but by actual endorsement.
>
>Regards,
>
>Sandy
>-----------------------------
>
>
>PROPRIETARY INFORMATION NOTICE:   This e-mail message and all
>attachments transmitted with it are intended solely for use by the
>addressee and may contain proprietary information of Mirion Technologies
>and/or its affiliates.  If the reader of this message is not the
>intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review,
>dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this message is
>strictly prohibited.  If you have received this message in error, please
>notify the sender immediately by replying to the message, delete the
>original message and all attachments from your computer, and destroy any
>copies you may have made.  Thank you.
>_______________________________________________
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>_______________________________________________
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
>the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
>http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
>visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>_______________________________________________
>You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
>Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
>For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/