[ RadSafe ] Linac Shield calculation / NCRP 151 and others..
Mark Ramsay
mark.ramsay at ionactive.co.uk
Sun Jul 5 00:34:56 CDT 2009
Morning all.
A little mystery I am trying to solve - would be useful if anyone who
works with medical linacs could give me their views.
This should be so simple - but the results have not been as expected.
Basic data:
10MV linac
6 Gy/min at Iso Centre
Distance between ISO and inner concrete primary wall = 5.8m
Concrete thickness is 210cm
Concrete density is 2.35
Use factor (Gantry) 0.25 (but not really needed here).
OK, using NCRP 151 and other references I make the calculated IDR
(Instantaneous dose rate) on the outer (safe) surface of the shield to
be 21 micro Sv/h.
A colleague using different references also calculated a IDR of around
21 micro Sv/h.
However, the maximum actual dose rate measured using two independent and
calibrated ion chambers was 44 micro Sv/h.
Calculations normally errr on side of caution - so what is going?
So far:
Concrete density - checked
Thickness - checked
Distances - checked
Linac output - checked
Concrete pour quality (not checked - but this occurs on both primary
shields so I would not expect the pour on both separate sides to be
equally poor).
For the record, I did not design this shielding and would have preferred
something a bit thicker. Furthermore, I know we are talking here about
IDR and in actual fact the 'dose-rate-in-any-one-hour' is acceptable.
But physics is physics and this is not rocket science - so what am I
missing here?
Any comments, advice would be helpful. Anyone willing to spend just s
couple of minutes repeating the above calculation using would also be
useful.
Thanks
Mark
Mark Ramsay
Radiation Protection Adviser
Ionactive Consulting Limited
Email: mark.ramsay at ionactive.co.uk <mailto:mark.ramsay at ionactive.co.uk>
Web: www.ionactive.co.uk <http://www.ionactive.co.uk>
Ionactive on Twitter
www.twitter.com/ionactive <http://www.twitter.com/ionactive>
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list