[ RadSafe ] Enforcement of IATA/ICAO/IAEA "regulations"

Luke McCormick mccormickl at hotmail.com
Thu Mar 19 13:39:21 CDT 2009

I have personally been audited twice by the FAA. We have made no commitments.  First was over a pressurized ion chamber I Fed Exed from a Houston hotel to Indy. The second was for a meter I shipped from Indy to the field. During the Indy audit I explained our whole way of shipping HAZMAT; from the initial and refresher training, through packaging, marking labeling, and manifesting. The inspectors in both cases were very satisfied and had no findingd 

Luke McCormick

UW Customs & Border Protection

> Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:01:51 -0400
> From: radcontrol at embarqmail.com
> To: radsafe at radlab.nl
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Enforcement of IATA/ICAO/IAEA "regulations"
> I was recently told by a respected colleague that he was aware of cases where USDOT and FAA inspectors had cited radioactive materials licensees for noncompliance with IATA/ICAO/IAEA "regulations." and had issued steep fines for the violations. I put the word "regulations" in quotations because these organizations are not regulatory agencies, but each issues what I would describe as "quasi-regs" because the IATA and the ICAO issue "instructions" on hazmat transportation that are followed by the airline industry and the IAEA "standards" are adopted by many foreign countries.
> The specific "requirement" my colleague mentioned was the IATA/ICAO requirement for hazmat employee training to be conducted at two year intervals, rather than the three year interval specified in 49 CFR Part 172, Subpart H.
> I emailed contacts at both agencies about this. My PHMSA contact told me that her agency doesn't enforce IATA. My FAA contact said that their inspectors will enforce whatever commitments are made in by the organizations they regulate, so if an FAA repair station commits to the IATA requirement for 2-yr. refresher training and they haven't done it, they will be cited, so based on that, it appears that at least the FAA does some enforcement of the requirement. The FAA's approach parallels my experience as a state radiation control regulator; if a rad. materials licensee commits to something (like 2-yr. hazmat employee refresher training), then my agency would hold them to it. 
> My concern is that anyone who uses FedEx or other common carriers for air shipments of RAM is expected to abide by IATA/ICAO requirements, but its not like FedEx is checking with their clients to see if they actually do it, so if a company never commits to anything in writing that could gig them by the FAA or another regulator, are they off the hook or not?
> My question to the group is, has anyone experienced enforcement of IATA/ICAO/IAEA requirements by the USDOT or FAA? If so, what was the context and outcome?
> Any feedback on this topic would be helpful.
> Walt Cofer
> Radiation Control, Inc.
> Tallahassee, FL
> Tel: (850) 668-8559
> Cell: (850) 519-5351
> Email: radcontrol at embarqmail.com
> Web: www.rad-control.net
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/

Hotmail® is up to 70% faster. Now good news travels really fast. 

More information about the RadSafe mailing list