[ RadSafe ] Salsman warning

[Steven Dapra]

April 7

         I was going to weigh in here --- lambasting James again, 
like I did a few years ago in a battle over depleted uranium.  Why 
bother?  It would be the same as trying to throw a tennis ball 
through a concrete slab.

         Instead, I will say a good hearty AMEN to Gary's very 
trenchant comment that James'  claims have been thoroughly debunked, 
and the RADSAFE archives bear witness to that in every particular.

         Get a job, James, and do us all a big fat favor by staying 
off RADSAFE.  Thank you.

Steven Dapra


At 10:05 AM 4/7/2010, garyi at trinityphysics.com wrote:
>Did everyone notice: James affirms that attacks against your 
>employment are appropriate?
>He dressed it up in a pretty post, but he really says that ANYONE 
>who voices disagreement
>with him is fair game.  In other words, his cause is so worthwhile, 
>so noble, that mere
>humans can not be allowed to hinder it.  Where does he draw the 
>line?  If he is low enough to
>do that, would he hesitate to twist or falsify his information?
>
>Having already considered both sides of this tired debate, over and 
>over ad nauseam, I see
>no further reason to lend credence to any statement he might 
>make.  It is enough to say that
>his claims have been thoroughly debunked, and the radsafe archives 
>are available for
>anyone who doubts that.
>
>-Gary Isenhower