[ RadSafe ] FW: [gulflink] Low Level Radiation Exposures duringDesert storm
sjd at swcp.com
Tue Aug 31 19:02:36 CDT 2010
I did not read either paper. I imagine the Fatigue
Foundation is extrapolating from something to somewhere.
At 07:56 PM 8/30/2010, you wrote:
>Thank you, Steven,
>I note that the Australian paper does not even contain the word "radiation"
>so I wonder how it is supposedly related to radiation.
>From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Steven Dapra
>Sent: Monday, August 30, 2010 6:44 PM
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List;
>radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] FW: [gulflink] Low Level Radiation Exposures
>August 30, 2010
> This quote is from the Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Foundation's
>press release, whose full text is at the bottom of this posting:
>"Gail Kansky, President, stated, "The Foundation's real revelation came
>when our staff linked specific research on mitochondrial DNA deletions,
>published by Australian scientists in 1995, to work published by
>scientists in Ireland in 2005."
> This is the link to the Australian work:
> This is the link to the work done in Ireland:
> Links to these papers, and more material, will be found at
>this Foundation link:
> Another press release quote says, "The Foundation has also
>noted that CFS has been previously identified as a characteristic
>aftermath of radioecological catastrophe." This catastrophe is ---
>of course --- Chernobyl. The Foundation link has links to papers (in
>PDF) purporting to explain all this.
> The Australian paper is "Unusual pattern of mitochondrial
>DNA deletions in skeletal muscle of an adult human with Chronic
>Fatigue Syndrome," by Zhang, Baumer, Mackay, Linnane,and Nagley; in:
>Human Molecular Genetics 4(4):751-754; 1995.
> The paper from Ireland is "Mitochondrial DNA point mutations
>and a novel deletion induced by direct Low-LET radiation and by
>medium from irradiated cells, by Murphy, Nugent, Seymour, and
>Mothersill; in: Mutation Research, 585(___): 127-136; 2005.
> All of this is far over my head, so I can not discuss it. I
>am merely providing the links and citations.
More information about the RadSafe