[ RadSafe ] Vermont Yankee leaking tritium --- time to panic(?)

[William Lipton]

I suggest reviewing the following GAO report about the Brookhaven National
Laboratory hfbr, as an example of what NOT to do about a tritium leak:
http://www.gao.gov/archive/1998/rc98026.pdf .

Bill Lipton
doctorbill at post.harvard.edu
It's not about  dose, it's about trust.

On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:54 AM, <dckosloff at firstenergycorp.com> wrote:

>
>
>  "But in 2005, the National Academy of Sciences concluded after an
> exhaustive study that even the tiniest amount of
>  ionizing radiation increases the risk of cancer."
>
>  From the article, the voice of authority as understood by the public.  Of
> course, the statement, once made was not carried
>  to its logical conclusions.
>
>  Don Kosloff
>  License Renewal
>  Oak Harbor Ohio
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>             Steven Dapra
>             <sjd at swcp.com>
>             Sent by:                                                   To
>             radsafe-bounces at r         radsafe at radlab.nl
>             adlab.nl                                                   cc
>
>                                                                   Subject
>             02/01/2010 08:50          [ RadSafe ] Vermont Yankee leaking
>             PM                        tritium --- time to panic(?)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Feb. 1
>
>
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100201/ap_on_bi_ge/us_leaking_nuclear_plants
>
>
> Steven Dapra
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> The information contained in this message is intended only for the
> personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
> agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
> and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
> this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
> the original message.
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the
> RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>