[ RadSafe ] re: Nader claims

Tue Feb 16 00:29:52 CST 2010

Dear Mr Don Kosloff

It is surprising that Mr Mader is so biased that he is unable to find the difference between "no new licenses issued for a nuclear power plant after 1979" and "nuclear power plants connected to the grid since 1979. In my younger years, I, like many other Indians, was an admirer of Mr Nader. He was then reputed to have an army of specialists feeding him with accurate data on various matters. What happened to those young activists.

For the sake of record:
No one abandoned nuclear power because of accidents. Electric companies connected 50 out of the hundred and four currently operating nuclear power plants in USA to the electric grid since 1979 ; nineteen of these after 1986, the year in which the accident at the Chernobyl nuclear power station occurred.Canadian companies connected all the currently operating nuclear power plants in Canada to the grid after 1979. Fifty three out of  59 French reactors came on line after 1979. Rectors contribute power significantly not withstanding the fear of nuclear accidents.

Regards
Parthasarathy

________________________________
From: "dckosloff at firstenergycorp.com" <dckosloff at firstenergycorp.com>
To: Maury Siskel <maurysis at peoplepc.com>
Cc: Radsafe <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Tue, 16 February, 2010 6:18:48
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] re: Nader claims

These are astounding claims my Nader

No Nukes  by Ralph Nader

"A generation of Americans has grown up without a single nuclear power
plant being brought on line since before the near meltdown of the Three
Mile Island structure in 1979."

Only there have been 46 nuclear power plants brought on line since 1979.
That includes North Anna 2 and Sequoyah 1 in 1980, and Watts Bar 1 in 1996.

"They have not been exposed to the
enormous costs, risks and national security dangers associated with
their operations and the large amount of radioactive wastes still
without a safe, permanent storage place for tens of thousands of years."

This makes absolutely no sense at all.  What does Nader think happened to
all of the nukes that are operating today?

Not that any of the rest is any more rational.

Don Kosloff
Oak Harbor, Ohio

             Maury Siskel                                                  
             <maurysis at peoplep                                            
             c.com>                                                     To 
             Sent by:                  Radsafe <radsafe at radlab.nl>        
             radsafe-bounces at r                                          cc 
             adlab.nl                                                      
                                                                   Subject 
                                       [ RadSafe ] re: Nader claims        
             02/15/2010 03:04                                              
             PM                                                            

Thought radsafe readers should be aware of this [extract of a] Nader
editorial.  If someone has numbers handy, then it would be nice to
supply an answer to  "...  the enormous costs, risks and national
security dangers associated with their operations and the large amount
of radioactive wastes  ..."  by our production of electricity by nat
gas, coal, wind, and solar panels.
Cheers,
Maury&Dog  [MaurySiskel maurysis at peoplepc.com]

--------------start quote---------
  Published on Saturday, February 13, 2010 by CommonDreams.org

No Nukes  by Ralph Nader

A generation of Americans has grown up without a single nuclear power
plant being brought on line since before the near meltdown of the Three
Mile Island structure in 1979. They have not been exposed to the
enormous costs, risks and national security dangers associated with
their operations and the large amount of radioactive wastes still
without a safe, permanent storage place for tens of thousands of years.

All Americans better get informed soon, for a resurgent atomic power
lobby wants the taxpayers to pick up the tab for relaunching this
industry. Unless you get Congress to stop this insanely dirty and
complex way to boil water to generate steam for electricity, you'll be
paying for the industry's research, the industry's loan guarantees and
the estimated trillion dollars (inflation-adjusted) cost of just one
meltdown, according to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, plus vast
immediate and long-range casualties.

The Russian roulette-playing nuclear industry claims a class nine
meltdown will never happen. That none of the thousands of rail cars,
trucks and barges with radioactive wastes will ever have a catastrophic
accident. That terrorists will forgo striking a nuclear plant or
hijacking deadly materials, and go for far less consequential disasters.
--------------end quote-----------

-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this message is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If
the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or an
agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you
are hereby notified that you have received this document in error
and that any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of
this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately, and delete
the original message.
_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/