[ RadSafe ] RE: Cell Phone Hormesis?

[Dimiter Popoff]

> Although this is well outside of my field, I can see a possible
> mechanism for the reported effect.  If the plaque that appears to cause
> Alzheimer's adheres to the capillary wall through van der Waals forces,
> I see the possibility that RF energy might be enough to disrupt the
> connection, allowing the plaque to break up.  I don't know; just
> speculation. 

Or it could turn out that it takes just raising the temerature
of some part of the brain by 1-2 C thus getting the effect - which
may be direct or indirect...
Just my speculation - and I have no medical background so this may
be obviously rubbish. Perhaps someone with some real knowledge
on carbon based systems could say something (my knowledge being
restricted to silicon based ones :-) ) .

Dimiter

------------------------------------------------------
Dimiter Popoff               Transgalactic Instruments

http://www.tgi-sci.com
------------------------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/didi_tgi/sets/72157600228621276/


> From: "Brennan, Mike  (DOH)" <Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV>
> To: <radsafe at radlab.nl>
> Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Cell Phone Hormesis?
> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 09:38:53 -0800
> 
> Hi, Cary.  Thanks for bringing this up.
> 
> It will be interesting to see if others can duplicate this (I would like
> to see a double blind, where there are multiple identical set-ups, with
> some of the antenna radiating and some not, and the people handling the
> animals not knowing which antenna is which, or which animals have
> Alzheimer's or not). =20
> 
> Although this is well outside of my field, I can see a possible
> mechanism for the reported effect.  If the plaque that appears to cause
> Alzheimer's adheres to the capillary wall through van der Waals forces,
> I see the possibility that RF energy might be enough to disrupt the
> connection, allowing the plaque to break up.  I don't know; just
> speculation.
> 
> Another aspect of this is that I don't see a reason not to move into
> human testing immediately.  Having lost my Mother-in-law to Alzheimer's
> about a year ago, I see no downside to trying something like this that
> is cheap, painless, and easy.  The current "conventional" treatment at
> its most successful just stretches out the process, often with the
> result of letting the patient more fully appreciate the horror of what
> is happening to them.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On
> Behalf Of Cary Renquist
> Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:52 AM
> To: radsafe at radlab.nl
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Cell Phone Hormesis?
> 
> The experiment hasn't been duplicated yet, so the results might be just
> a fluke.
> 
> Cary
> --
> Cary.renquist at ezag.com
> 
> 
> http://bit.ly/4YnP4r
> 
> Cellphone radiation is good for Alzheimer's mice
> 
> Despite years of demonization, mobile phones might actually do us more
> good than harm. Regular exposure to an electromagnetic field identical
> to the ones produced by mobile phones seems to improve memory in mice
> with symptoms of Alzheimer's disease.
>
>
>
>
>