[ RadSafe ] BS to the max. Was: Re: Political vs natural market economics in nuclear power

[Howard Long]

Sorry, Stewart.
Respose to retain humility when so much is still art rather than science in physics was my caution.

Howard Long 

On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:24 PM, Stewart Farber <radproject at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

> What is going on with the endless  threads not related in any way to health physics, or radiation technologies?  Threads related to Creationism, Sarah Palin, Intelligent design [sic], the length of god's day, greenhouse gas conspiracy theories, Ivy elite, Mr. Al's disciples, etc.????  Let's stop it before this site becomes even more off-track and foolish.
> 
> Please, I'm wearing out my delete key. The nonsense [i.e.: major evidence of unintelligent design] overwhelming Radsafe is totally out of control. 
> 
> As a profession,  don't we have enough to do dealing with the public's radiophobia that substantially affects radiation technologies of every type? Do we have to spit in the wind of public opinion on the Greenhouse effect and climate change? Does anyone really think there is anything to gain by wading into the quagmire of issues mentioned above? The preceding are simply rhetorical questions. I am not seeking an answer.
> 
> 
> Stewart Farber, MSPH
> 
> Farber Medical Solutions, LLC.
> 
> Bridgeport, CT 06604
> 
> 
> 
> [203] 441-8433 [office]
> 
> website: http://www.farber-medical.com
> =================
> 
> --- On Tue, 11/2/10, Howard Long <howard.long at comcast.net> wrote:
> 
> From: Howard Long <howard.long at comcast.net>
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Political vs natural market economics in nuclear power
> To: "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
> Cc: "The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List" <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
> Date: Tuesday, November 2, 2010, 11:44 PM