[ RadSafe ] Pilots urged to avoid body scanning
Doug Huffman
doug.huffman at wildblue.net
Sat Nov 13 07:38:12 CST 2010
There seems to be some confusion of 'scanners' using millimeter radar
with X-ray backscatter scanners.
On 11/12/2010 11:15, Mark Ramsay wrote:
> Agree...
>
> Without getting too hung up about exact figures.
>
> Typical back scatter scan - 0.06 micro Sv (effective dose)
>
> Typical dose rate at 37,000 above the UK - 5 micro Sv/h (high energy
> radiation / neutrons etc etc).
>
> (We could have a separate debate about low energy x-rays delivered at
> very high dose rate to the skin vs. High energy penetrating radiation -
> another day!).
>
> I think the health issue is a red herring, but might be used to enhance
> their cause (i.e. do not want to be scanned).
>
> That said, I have questioned various cabin crew / pilots when flying for
> work and in most cases they appear to pretty much unaware of the
> magnitude of the radiation dose received during their work. If this is
> so then it might well be that they are worried about the back scatter
> systems - in which case some education is needed at flying school!
>
> Rgs
>
> Mark
>
> www.ionactive.co.uk
>
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list