[ RadSafe ] Definition of "pollution

Maury Siskel maurysis at peoplepc.com
Fri Oct 22 17:53:59 CDT 2010

Yeah Jerry, but you have to add that EPA and the Supreme Court do not 
like.  How will we be handled as continuous emitters of CO2?
Maury&Dog  (Maury Siskel maurysis at peoplepc.com]
Jerry Cohen wrote:

>So, CO2 is a pollutant. From current dialog on the subject a new all-encompaaing 
>definition of pollution seems to have emerged---
>Pollution is anything thatyou release to the environment, and that I don't like.
>From: "Ottley, David B (Dave)" <David_B_Dave_Ottley at RL.gov>
>To: "radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu" <radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
>Sent: Thu, October 21, 2010 7:46:27 PM
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] RadSafe Digest, Vol 438, Issue 1
>Substituting "radiation" for "CO2" isn't this like saying, "Temporarily ignoring 
>whether or not radiation is harmful, 

More information about the RadSafe mailing list